Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity (and missing DLAs on www.do)

2020-08-18 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi One thing to consider when implementing a delay. You typically reserve the DLA some time before making the update so the time you select will most likely be wrong. Based on this I tend to agree with Holger that any time you select will not be suitable. :-) But sure some delay may be ok. // Ol

Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity (and missing DLAs on www.do)

2020-08-18 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, According to https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Claim_a_DLA_ID_in_DLA.2Flist one reserves the DLA number right /after/ the upload, with a dated entry in data/DLA/list, so it's meant to be used quickly. That being said, I modified the script to not only s/committer/package/, but also prin

Re: (semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity (and missing DLAs on www.do)

2020-08-18 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi On 18/08/2020 00:08, Holger Levsen wrote: > I believe that wouldn't change anything. If the script would only > complain about DLA reservations X hours old, of course $you would send > the DLA right after my mail / after X hours + 2 minutes. I was thinking of 24h, in which case it's perfectly