Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi Security Team,
>
> The LTS project would like to keep supporting 'unbound', for which security
> support was dropped last May (DSA 4694-1), IIRC due to the risks of
> maintaining a version that was not supported upstream anymore.
>
> The plan we identified is to
Hi Security Team,
The LTS project would like to keep supporting 'unbound', for which
security support was dropped last May (DSA 4694-1), IIRC due to the
risks of maintaining a version that was not supported upstream anymore.
The plan we identified is to backport buster's versions
