Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

Sylvain Beucler wrote: > >> Will resolve these two. > > > > Um, I just uploaded libpam-tacplus. Maybe take care of pyxdg, > > please? Thank you! > > How about you add these 6 packages to data/dla-needed.txt? Good idea — done. (Utkarsh, judging by the timestamps, your mail had not landed on the l

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 09:37:57AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > > >> Will resolve these two. > > > > > > Um, I just uploaded libpam-tacplus. Maybe take care of pyxdg, > > > please? Thank you! > > > > How about you add these 6 packages to data/dla-needed.txt? > > Good idea

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

hi, thank you all for taking care of the problems Andreas reported! And to Andreas (and piuparts) for informing us! :) On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:52:51PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On a more general note, we could try to become better at also fixing > the same CVEs in packages in more recent di

(E)LTS report for July 2021

hi, in July 2021 I spent 3.5h managing (E)LTS contributors: - dispatch work hours for LTS and ELTS - prepare the monthly Freexian blog post published on raphaelhertzog.com - mail and irc communication, incl. - semi-automatic unclaim packages - too many claimed packages - missing DLAs on www