Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, I found another one in non-free: jessie-lts has amd64-microcode 3.20181128.1~deb8u1 but stretch has only 3.20160316.3 amd64-microcode | 2.20160316.1~deb8u1 | jessie/non-free| source, amd64, i386 amd64-microcode | 3.20160316.3 | stretch/non-free | source,

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Andreas, > jessie-lts has amd64-microcode 3.20181128.1~deb8u1 but stretch has only > 3.20160316.3 Thanks for this. Have added to amd64-microcode to data/ela-needed.txt so this gets addressed. If it helps, here is the most-recent changelog entry: Source: amd64-microcode Version: 3.2018112

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 12:16:44PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > PS: udd does not know about elts packages, does it? ELTS is not part of the Debian archive and I believe noone has taught UDD yet how to track it. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Chris, On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:53 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > Thanks for this. Have added to amd64-microcode to data/ela-needed.txt > so this gets addressed. As I understand it, this needs fixing in stretch and not jessie. So needs to be added to dla-needed. That said, whilst I am cleaning all so

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Utkarsh, > > Thanks for this. Have added to amd64-microcode to data/ela-needed.txt > > so this gets addressed. > > As I understand it, this needs fixing in stretch and not jessie. So > needs to be added to dla-needed. That said, whilst I am cleaning all > sorts of bugs like these, I'll take thi

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Chris, On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 4:18 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > > As I understand it, this needs fixing in stretch and not jessie. So > > needs to be added to dla-needed. That said, whilst I am cleaning all > > sorts of bugs like these, I'll take this one as well. > > Ah, I saw "jessie" and quickly