On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 02:32:42PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
>
> Alberto, does the following change matches your thoughts?
>
> diff --git a/security-support-limited.deb11 b/security-support-limited.deb11
> index 7f5a45e..bac9734 100644
> --- a/security-support-limited.deb11
> +++ b/secu
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:27:51PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> A recent compiler is always already available:
>
> Debian *stable distributions (including LTS) already add a new LLVM
> major version annually since that is required for the latest Rust
> every new Firefox ESR branch needs.
Thanks, I
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Ack, given the changes (particularly switching to libc++) and the
> reported regressions, I think we just EOL at this point. I don't
> know if WebKit upstream would consider a longer support period on
> the stable branches or
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:53:40AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I have been testing it a bit using a buster VM but I don't think this
> > is very stable.
> >
> > After removing ~/.cache/epiphany, ~/.local/share/epiphany and
> > ~/.local/share/webkitgtk I am having problems to open web
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 02:17:37PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I have prepared a repository at
>
> deb [allow-insecure=yes] https://people.debian.org/~pochu/lts/webkit/ ./
>
> I'd appreciate some testing of any webkit applications (epiphany-browser,
> evolution...) that you can.
I
