Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:22:51PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to ask everyone who uses Java in server or desktop
> environments to test their applications with OpenJDK 7 and to prepare
> for the switch. This can be achieved by installing either openjdk-7-jre
> or openjdk-7-jr
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice
> declares dependencies on default-jre | openjdk-7-jre, so I believe it
> should be fine. I am aware of build failures with OpenJDK 7 and I think
> that c
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:34:53PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 25.04.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice
> >&g
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:03:13AM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Wheezy version of libreoffice:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-4324
>
> Would you like to take care of this yours
Hi again,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:03:13AM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
> If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an
> updated source package and send it to debian-lts@lists.debian.org
> (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the source package,
> or even with a pointer
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:12:16PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Thank you for preparing the patch.
> I'm building it right now and would like to test it if you have not done so
> yet.
> After it is tested feel free to upload it.
Then it's best you mergechanges and upload after testing, I on
[ CC'ing team@security so that they know nothing supported is affected by
it. ]
Hi,
apparently Apache knew it since October 2015, tested with "current" LibreOffices
but they said they didn't test with old, so didn't inform LO *at all* until
this came up last Thursday again confirming that old LOs
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:43:36AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> A (untested, except that the patch applies) source package is - as last time -
> available on http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/wheezy
I noticed Balint did some additional changes to deb7u7 (build-depends
on
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:12:04AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I noticed Balint did some additional changes to deb7u7 (build-depends
> on fixed graphite2 - thanks for that), so this needs
> either be merged into my deb7u8 or I can redo it this evening...
now done.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:00:11PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2016-08-04 19:34 GMT+02:00 Rene Engelhard :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:12:04AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >> I noticed Balint did some additional changes to deb7u7 (build-d
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:13:34PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> - -
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-3792-1 secur...@debian.org
> https://www.deb
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:01:52AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > I have also prepared it for wheezy-lts. Should build (my build is
> > still running), basically just took the patch from Ubuntu (in contrast to
So far for this..
[ build CXX ] sd/source/core/drawdoc
R=/home/rene/Debian/Pakete
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38:29PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ build CXX ] sd/source/ui/docshell/docshel4
> /home/rene/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice/libreoffice-3.5.4+dfsg2/sd/source/core/drawdoc.cxx:
> In member function 'void SdDrawDocument::UpdateAllLinks()&
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:51:08AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Do you have a PoC for testing?
> I tried triggering the issue on Wheezy without any luck so far.
Forwarded you the original mail from September in private mail.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:01:38PM +1000, Allan Hughson wrote:
>I upgraded to version: 1:3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u9 yesterday and noticed the
Yesterday?
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/04/msg00029.html. April 23.
Not upgrading for security issues in two weeks?
>charts in
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:16:17PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Wheezy version of graphite2:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/graphite2
>
> Last time we had issues, it lo
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:16:17PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> > currently open in the Wheezy version of graphite2:
>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
> I prepared LTS security update for graphite2[1]. Debdiff is attached.
> All tests ran successfully. Please review.
Why would we need one given for jessie and stretch it is clearly marked
as no-DSA?
https://security-tracker.debian.org/
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 19.03.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
> >> I prepared LTS security update for graphite2[1]. Debdiff is attached.
> >> All tes
Hi,
whatever is fine, I can live with both, but:
Am 07.09.22 um 07:37 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
Now that buster is LTS and no longer officially supported, should the
-backports pocket be closed? AFAIK, buster just receives the security
uploads by the -security pocket and shouldn't have -backports
20 matches
Mail list logo
