Hi Chris,
On 04-01-16 13:20, Chris Lamb wrote:
> cacti (0.8.7g-1+squeeze9+deb6u13) squeeze-lts; urgency=high
> .
>* Correct yet another regression in patch for CVE-2015-8369, introduced in
> 0.8.7g-1+squeeze9+deb6u12. Thanks to Marcel Meckel
> (Closes: #809260, #807599)
Apart fro
> Apart from your weird continuation of the squeeze version numbers ;),
> thanks a lot for the cacti updates in lts.
Well, once I started for this particular cacti version, I can hardly
obstinately backtrack :)
> To be honest, I would have expected you would have shared your fix somewhere,
> e.
Hi Chris,
On 05-01-16 00:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> To be honest, I would have expected you would have shared your fix
>> somewhere, e.g. also in a regular bug against cacti such that the
>> (old)stable releases could more easily see/use the patch.
>
> I will happily add it too your bug tracker as
