Re: Accepted openjdk-7 7u121-2.6.8-1~deb7u1 (source all amd64) into oldstable

Ok, thanks. // Ola On 31 January 2017 at 00:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 27/01/17 22:18, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> Hi Emilio >> >> I saw that you have uploaded a new openjdk-7 package. Were that >> package supposed to fix the current issues reported for openjdk-7 or

Re: Accepted openjdk-7 7u121-2.6.8-1~deb7u1 (source all amd64) into oldstable

On 27/01/17 22:18, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi Emilio > > I saw that you have uploaded a new openjdk-7 package. Were that > package supposed to fix the current issues reported for openjdk-7 or > was that corrections for earlier version? It doesn't fix the latest round of CVEs. > I'm asking

Re: Accepted openjdk-7 7u121-2.6.8-1~deb7u1 (source all amd64) into oldstable

Hi Emilio I saw that you have uploaded a new openjdk-7 package. Were that package supposed to fix the current issues reported for openjdk-7 or was that corrections for earlier version? I'm asking because: 1) I have not seen the DLA. It seems to have gone missing. 2) I would like to know whether

Accepted openjdk-7 7u121-2.6.8-1~deb7u1 (source all amd64) into oldstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:29:51 +0100 Source: openjdk-7 Binary: openjdk-7-jdk openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre openjdk-7-jre-lib openjdk-7-demo openjdk-7-source openjdk-7-doc openjdk-7-dbg icedtea-7-jre-cacao icedtea-7-jre-jamvm