On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:21:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Update security-support-limited from 1:12+2022.08.12 from unstable,
> > thus adding golang and khtml
> > not adding cython, python2.7 and python-stdlib-extensions and mosjs78
> > as they should still be covered.
On 17/08/2022 11:19, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:30:03AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
- today prepare buster branch for release (33% done, see below)
- today until aug 23: possible further updates to the master branch
which then get copied to the buster branch
- aug 23: upl
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:30:03AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> - today prepare buster branch for release (33% done, see below)
> - today until aug 23: possible further updates to the master branch
> which then get copied to the buster branch
> - aug 23: upload & SRM bug
> - aug 27: freeze
> - s
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 06:07:14PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> just to clarify the things. If the "-limited" file will be versioned,
> I think it is better not to include python2.7 or cython
> into the buster-file, as we still support them for buster. But,
> some internal scripts should be modifie
Hi Holger,
just to clarify the things. If the "-limited" file will be versioned,
I think it is better not to include python2.7 or cython
into the buster-file, as we still support them for buster. But,
some internal scripts should be modified in this case to
use the suffix.
If it remains versioned
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Regarding your question, if there are not other objections, I would say
> please go ahead with an upload (despite python2.7).
Anton, what do you mean with that python2.7 comment?
pochu also said on irc:
h01ger: I think it makes se
Hi Holger,
thanks for taking care of it!
Regarding your question, if there are not other objections, I would say
please go ahead with an upload (despite python2.7).
Regards
Anton
Am Sa., 13. Aug. 2022 um 11:30 Uhr schrieb Holger Levsen <
hol...@layer-acht.org>:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:06:21PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> yes, I have uploading debian-security-support to buster for the last
> point release on my agenda and will do that upload as needed.
As there has now been a date announced for the final buster point release,
the timeline for this has
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I have nothing planned for the immediate future, and the discussion seems to
> have reached consensus, so I think it's good for upload :)
thanks, uploaded.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducibl
Hi Holger,
On 12/08/2022 14:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 02:26:09PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I see those changes were applied in the master branch. Should they be
backported to the buster branch, with an eventual upload / DLA?
yes, I have uploading debian-secur
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 02:26:09PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I see those changes were applied in the master branch. Should they be
> backported to the buster branch, with an eventual upload / DLA?
yes, I have uploading debian-security-support to buster for the last
point release on my
On 10/08/2022 17:10, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Hi,
On 10/08/2022 11:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 09/08/2022 19:04, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Here's a little recap for security-support-ended.deb9 -> deb10 evaluation,
following our discussion, also including dropped entries for
completeness/t
Hi,
On 10/08/2022 11:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 09/08/2022 19:04, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Here's a little recap for security-support-ended.deb9 -> deb10
evaluation, following our discussion, also including dropped entries
for completeness/transparency:
Supported again in buster:
-
Hi Sylvain,
On 09/08/2022 19:04, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Hi,
Here's a little recap for security-support-ended.deb9 -> deb10 evaluation,
following our discussion, also including dropped entries for
completeness/transparency:
Supported again in buster:
- ansible
- chromium
chromium was alre
Hi,
Here's a little recap for security-support-ended.deb9 -> deb10
evaluation, following our discussion, also including dropped entries for
completeness/transparency:
Supported again in buster:
- ansible
- chromium
- keystone [openstack]
- node-.* <-- important
- nodejs <-- important
- pd
15 matches
Mail list logo
