On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:46:13 +0100
"Chris Lamb" wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> > My guess has been that we should not generally fix lintian warnings
> > unless they are really important.
>
> (Agree with this, of course.)
>
> > So I assume quite a few of them could be removed. But maybe I'm
> > wrong h
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:58:02PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whilst I think of it, are there any changes to Lintian that folks
> here might consider particularly useful when doing LTS development?
To which lintian?
Running stretch lintian tends to give more useful information for
packa
Hi Ola,
> My guess has been that we should not generally fix lintian warnings
> unless they are really important.
(Agree with this, of course.)
> So I assume quite a few of them could be removed. But maybe I'm wrong
> here.
That could work, although it would have the drawback of potentially
hid
Hi Chris and others
My guess has been that we should not generally fix lintian warnings unless
they are really important.
So I assume quite a few of them could be removed. But maybe I'm wrong here.
Cheers
// Ola
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 18:58, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whilst I think of it,
Hi,
Whilst I think of it, are there any changes to Lintian that folks
here might consider particularly useful when doing LTS development?
I've already implemented some changes to not emit some specific
warnings when doing security updates, particularly to do with version
numbering. This is on the
