Hi,
I prepared an update for ghostscript.
https://people.debian.org/~beuc/lts/ghostscript/
Even if we recently rebased to the latest upstream in jessie, the
upstream patches did not apply cleanly and I did my best to replicate
the changes.
Note: we ship a 9.26*a* version which upstream does not p
On 25/03/2019 16:11, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared an update for ghostscript.
> https://people.debian.org/~beuc/lts/ghostscript/
>
> Even if we recently rebased to the latest upstream in jessie, the
> upstream patches did not apply cleanly and I did my best to replicate
> the changes.
e list, because browsing archives is
usually informative and time-saving :)
The previous ghostscript upload also benefited from private real-life
testing on a cluster that was since then upgraded to squeeze, so
ghostscript testing remains an open issue.
Another argument in favor of going with 9.27.
Markus, I read in the archives that you backported fixes in earlier
security uploads - any other tip? :)
Cheers!
Sylvain
Hi,
Am 26.03.19 um 15:55 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
[...]
> Markus, I read in the archives that you backported fixes in earlier
> security uploads - any other tip? :)
I did all the testing myself by setting up a Jessie environment and then
I tested with the POCs and the command line tools to spot a
Hi,
On 27/03/2019 00:00, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 26.03.19 um 15:55 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
> [...]
>> Markus, I read in the archives that you backported fixes in earlier
>> security uploads - any other tip? :)
> I did all the testing myself by setting up a Jessie environment and then
> I test
