Hi
Yes I forgot to push my changes. Thanks for handling it for me.
// Ola
On 12 April 2018 at 14:14, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I thought I did. Maybe I forgot to push my changes.
>
> Thanks for resolving it.
>
> // Ola
>
> On 11 April 2018 at 22:18, Antoine Beaupré
> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-0
Hi
I thought I did. Maybe I forgot to push my changes.
Thanks for resolving it.
// Ola
On 11 April 2018 at 22:18, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-04-10 14:33:28, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi Salvatore
> >
> > Great. Thanks. Then we do not need to do anything more to libgcrypt. I'll
> > remove
On 2018-04-10 14:33:28, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Salvatore
>
> Great. Thanks. Then we do not need to do anything more to libgcrypt. I'll
> remove it from dla-needed.txt.
Assuming you forgot to do so, I went ahead and removed it from
dla-needed.txt and marked it as no-dsa in wheezy.
A.
--
Argui
Hi Salvatore
Great. Thanks. Then we do not need to do anything more to libgcrypt. I'll
remove it from dla-needed.txt.
// Ola
On 9 April 2018 at 21:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I found another iss
Hi Ola,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I found another issue that looks very similar. It is
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6594
>
> Should we treat it the same way, marking it as ignored?
I guess you mean CVE-2018-6829?
If so
Hi all
I found another issue that looks very similar. It is
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6594
Should we treat it the same way, marking it as ignored?
Best regards
// Ola
On 9 April 2018 at 07:26, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:0
