Hi folks,
[With LTS Front Desk hat on]
Yesterday carnil noticed that Holger already reserved a DLA for wpa but
Andrej had claimed wpa in data/dla-needed list.
Was this overlap resolved? We have enough to do with potential
duplicated work, after all.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : C
Hi Andrej,
> I guess there’s some room for improvement in the processes to prevent
> that in future: maybe we can have a script to claim a package
Ignoring the *script* angle for now, I'm a little lost as isn't this
what data/dla-needed.txt file is for?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Hi,
On 10 August 2018 at 08:40, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> [With LTS Front Desk hat on]
>
> Yesterday carnil noticed that Holger already reserved a DLA for wpa but
> Andrej had claimed wpa in data/dla-needed list.
>
> Was this overlap resolved? We have enough to do with potential
> duplica
Chris Lamb writes:
> Ignoring the *script* angle for now, I'm a little lost as isn't this
> what data/dla-needed.txt file is for?
Looks like the relevant commits are:
commit 8f0ae946288e80e2091e214ddd765e5c3f52d9b9
Author: Holger Levsen
Date: Thu Aug 9 00:58:06 2018 +0200
Reserve DLA-1
Andrej,
> It is, but I guess the manual editing may be confusing for someone not
> familiar with the workflow. And, possibly, the separation between "DLA
> needed" and "claim a DLA". And the fact that the gen-DLA cannot just
> generate a notification for an existing DLA number
Whilst there may be
Hi,
On 10 August 2018 at 09:02, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Andrej,
>
>> I guess there’s some room for improvement in the processes to prevent
>> that in future: maybe we can have a script to claim a package
>
> Ignoring the *script* angle for now, I'm a little lost as isn't this
> what data/dla-neede
hi,
no need to cc: me, i'm subscribed to the lts list.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:13:51AM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> It is, but I guess the manual editing may be confusing for someone not
> familiar with the workflow. And, possibly, the separation between "DLA
> needed" and "claim a DLA". And
Holger Levsen wrote:
[…]
> of that page and then I found the entry where it describes how to claim
> a DLA, which I did, thinking this would be visible enough (and maybe
> automatically put an entry into dla-needed.txt.)
It would not be correct that generating a DLA would add an entry to
dla-need
El 10/08/18 a las 10:20, Chris Lamb escribió:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> […]
> > of that page and then I found the entry where it describes how to claim
> > a DLA, which I did, thinking this would be visible enough (and maybe
> > automatically put an entry into dla-needed.txt.)
>
> It would not b
Santiago,
> Maybe the documentation lacks to explicitly state to run gen-DLA only
> when the uploaded package have been accepted, and built on all the
> architectures?
To be clear, I was merely outlining the process at a very high level
and only referring to things relevant to the discussion at-h
Chris Lamb writes:
> It would not be correct that generating a DLA would add an entry to
> dla-needed.txt; quite the opposite as releasing a DLA ipso-facto
> implies that the work has been completed and thus nothing is needed
> anymore.
Maybe gen-DLA could check and warn if there is no dla-neede
On Sat, 11 Aug 2018, Brian May wrote:
> Chris Lamb writes:
>
> > It would not be correct that generating a DLA would add an entry to
> > dla-needed.txt; quite the opposite as releasing a DLA ipso-facto
> > implies that the work has been completed and thus nothing is needed
> > anymore.
>
> Maybe
Dear Raphael,
> > Maybe gen-DLA could check and warn if there is no dla-needed.txt entry?
>
> +1
Implemented in:
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/commit/d55d75ec0d37712970b3559edaaad50a8e8851e6
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:06:42AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Implemented in:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/commit/d55d75ec0d37712970b3559edaaad50a8e8851e6
I'm not sure this code is helpful as it is, because it assumes
-needed.txt and the DLA/DSA are gener
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm not sure this code is helpful as it is, because it assumes
> -needed.txt and the DLA/DSA are generated at the same time which often
> is not the case.
>
> AIUI the code needs to check if the package for which a DLA/DSA is
> generated is present
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:34:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The script removes the entry in -needed.txt, and it complains if no
> changes were made in -needed.txt. This can thus only happen when
> -needed.txt does not contain the entry at all.
ah, makes sense, thanks!
> At least that's how
16 matches
Mail list logo
