Hello ftp team,
as you already know Wheezy LTS is going to start on 26 April. Is there
anything that we can do to assist you in the process of enabling us to
work with the current wheezy-security distribution?
Our last information was that the switch would be "easy" [1] but in case
there is
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Holger Levsen wrote:
> does that even work? AIUI this would require LTS uploaders
> to have access to security.d.o, which won't happen because
> of embargoed issues…
Access to security.d.o is only needed if you have to approve the uploads.
Here the suite will be
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> > >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=prep-wheezy-lts;users=debian-lts@lists.debian.org
> >
> > While these two are long-standing enhancement bugs which would make
> > the security team work much easier, they are
Hi,
On Montag, 22. Februar 2016, Guido Günther wrote:
> > As I understand it, the plan is for wheezy-lts to re-
use
> > security.d.o:wheezy/updates directly, rather than a
separate suite on
> > ftp-master. Is that correct?
>
> I think so. See
>
>
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the
> > original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only
> > reply to
On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 18:42 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:27:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > If so then we need to consider how the transition works in the short
> > term. For example, the final point release of oldstable occurs after
> > security
[apologies to anyone who's ended up with three copies of this; the
original got eaten due to a misconfiguration on my side - please only
reply to this copy]
Hi,
As I understand it, the plan is for wheezy-lts to re-use
security.d.o:wheezy/updates directly, rather than a separate suite on
