Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:26:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi Guido > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > * the complete removal of tools/ioemu-qemu-xen - guess this was unused > > anyway since quiet some time, right? > > I have no idea and found not one

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:56:28PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > while I'm glad that the xen upload will finally happen soon… oh, the joys of catching up on mails and reading not all mail before replying… in other words: thanks for the upload, Waldi! (+sorry for assuming the worst.) -- cheers,

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi, while I'm glad that the xen upload will finally happen soon… On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:26:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > If Brian has no objections feel free to upload, Please let me know once > > done so I can then release the DLA (in case you don't want to handle it > > youself). >

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi Guido On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > * the complete removal of tools/ioemu-qemu-xen - guess this was unused > anyway since quiet some time, right? I have no idea and found not one reference to that folder. > * there are some XSA related patches in

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi Hyacinthe On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:41:47PM +0200, Hyacinthe Cartiaux wrote: > I've tested in PV mode under wheezy x86_64: Thanks about the tests. Regards, Bastian -- Each kiss is as the first. -- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome", stardate

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hello, 2016-07-26 14:22 GMT+02:00 Bastian Blank : > I'm missing any test on Intel hardware. If this works I'll make a > release. I've tested in PV mode under wheezy x86_64: * I've deployed 2 fresh dom0 (2x Intel E5-2630L) with the updated xen packages

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi Guido I fixed the problem with i386. Turns out it was I way too large shift. Fixed sources: https://korte.credativ.com/~bbl/xen/xen_4.1.6.lts1~f5a8dc19-1.dsc On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:57:13PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > Can you give us an idea what you tested and what would be needed to

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi Bastian, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 01:04:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:24:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Why does > > https://github.com/credativ/xen-lts/blob/lts-status/security-status.md > > still have lots of question marks? > > What are we waiting to

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Bastian Blank writes: > Did you get the chance to look at this source? I think I need to see Debian sources to look at... Actually I suspect you are not getting emails from me for some reason, because you haven't responded to any of my recent emails to you. They do seem to be

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hello Bastian, On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:13:01AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > In my tests this backport works with live migration. Can someone else > > > give it a try? > > >

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi Raphael, Brian On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > So I would suggest that you go for this and provide some Xen tree free > > of known security issues, then Brian (or someone else) can build test > > packages and we can ask some users to test the update. > All

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hi Bastian, On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Bastian Blank wrote: > In my tests this backport works with live migration. Can someone else > give it a try? > https://github.com/credativ/xen-lts/tree/lts-4.1-xsa-97 If you expect people to test, you should provide packages ready to install. But I would

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:23:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Just wondering if you included this in version 4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2 by any > chance? The provided patches are incomplete, remove previous security fixes and does not compile. I'm currently backporting a larger bunch of the locking changes,

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Brian May writes: > It appears that we need an extra patch to get the fix for xsa97 working > properly. See the linked Ubuntu bug report. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/1515145 > > Just wondering if you included this in version 4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2 by any >

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

; Just to be clear; you replied to the thread on version >> xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc; however I never uploaded that version. It has >> known problems on i386. >> >> Maybe you meant to say you have version 4.1.6.1-1+deb7u1 ? >> > > yes. i've checked. the info is abou

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

rror. Dom0 and Domu are Wheezy amd64. > > Just to be clear; you replied to the thread on version > xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc; however I never uploaded that version. It has > known problems on i386. > > Maybe you meant to say you have version 4.1.6.1-1+deb7u1 ? > yes. i've c

Re: xen_4.1.6.1-1+deb7u2.dsc

Hello, i just want to inform you, that i had a very serios regession after upgrading to 4.1.6. Live-Migration of XEN-HVM guests ends in a dom0 crash or CPU Stuck Error. Dom0 and Domu are Wheezy amd64. -- Best Regards Stephan Helas