On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
Of course, I share your opinion. I do think that, since all in the
upstream tarball is free, it should go in main. It just seems that
either Debian as a whole disagrees, or that the majority is not
interested in overrulling the members of the ftpmaster
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHat do you mean with "title" if we are speaking about DDTP?
Short description. I hope I will not confuse too much the german
translators because I mistakenly used "title" in all my commentsÿÿ
Ahh, understand. Short description = Kurzbeschreibun
Le Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 09:11:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> IMHO, not our source tarball is the main target for the user but the
> binary package.
Hi Andreas,
this is exactly why I disagree with those who make it mandatory to
"clean" the upstream tarball from sourceless but otherwise f
Hi Charles!
On Nov 19, 2007 1:24 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have prepared a new version of dialign-t in which I rm-rf'ed the doc
> directory (I am pessimistic on the outcome of the discussion on -devel,
> which already digressed into an interesting debate about embedded
> fo
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
this is exactly why I disagree with those who make it mandatory to
"clean" the upstream tarball from sourceless but otherwise free
documentation.
I agree that you can use the same argument to support different
positions ...
I have prepared a new ver
[ Sorry for forewarding private mail, but I regarded it as the simplest was
to inform the list about the possible moves in this interesting project.]
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 19 November 2007 at 17:06, Mike Smoot wrote:
|
| I work on another free software pro
6 matches
Mail list logo
