Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 13:43 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:20:09AM -, Debian Wiki a écrit :
> > The following page has been changed by SteffenMoeller:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedMIME
> >
> > + Can someone confirm/improve
> > +
> > + ||'''Suffix'''|
Le Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
>
> What should be necessary?
To check for the presence of words other than `HEADER' in the first line
of pdb files.
> I would suggest or recommend chemical-mime-data. It also contains (as
> of version 0.1.95 IIRC) detection rou
Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 20:33 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> >
> > What should be necessary?
>
> To check for the presence of words other than `HEADER' in the first line
> of pdb files.
Well, I personally think, that we s
as per .pdb format version 2.3, all records must start with a HEADER
field.
Actually, a valid PDB format file must start with a HEADER record.
All records must start with a max 6 character long record type, i.e.
HEADER, COMPND, ATOM, etc.
But is the content of the file relevant for the mi
Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Morten Kjeldgaard:
> >
> > as per .pdb format version 2.3, all records must start with a HEADER
> > field.
>
> Actually, a valid PDB format file must start with a HEADER record.
> All records must start with a max 6 character long record type, i.e
Le Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:10:37PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
>
> But is the content of the file relevant for the mime-type? I thought
> it had to do with the extension only (and for PDB files, the typical
> extensions are .pdb and .ent).
Hi Morten,
The Internet Media Types (IMT) def
Le Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:28:24PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 20:33 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> > Le Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
>
> Well, I personally think, that we should *not* try to detect all broken
> formats, becaus
Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2008, 08:54 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:28:24PM +0100, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
[..]
> > Well, I personally think, that we should *not* try to detect all broken
> > formats, because companies/authors should better fix their software. So
> > I t
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Debian Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by CharlesPlessy:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedMIME
The comment on the change is:
update according to our discussions
---
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Debian Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by CharlesPlessy:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMedMIME
The comment on the change is:
filed a wishlist bug
--
Hi all,
I realised today that Clustal W and Clustal X have been updated:
ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/clustalw2/
There are now two separate packages. Clustal X ships a copy of
Clustal W, but without makefile. I wonder what we should do:
A) Give a separate source package to clustalw and clus
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
There are now two separate packages. Clustal X ships a copy of
Clustal W, but without makefile.
Sounds strange ...
But maybe the following is even simpler:
C) Ask upstream to add the makefile.
I'd prefer this for the profit of others than Debian
12 matches
Mail list logo
