Hi Nelson, thank you for the upload.
Le Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 03:39:57PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> $ uscan --report-status
> Processing watchfile line for package muscle...
> Newest version on remote site is 3.7, local version is 3.70+fix1
> (mangled local version number 3.7)
> => Pack
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote:
`grep -v '^#' debian/rules | wc -l` -le 17
This leaves as much space as needed for the comments and introduces
a very important number[1]. ;-))
This does not fully work: "#" might not be at the start of the line, and you're
Well, I was not reall
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that we all agree that the most complex packages should not use
a CDBS makefile with plenty of variables set to change the default
behavior. I do not find an easy quantitative way to formalise this in
our policy. Please feel free to propose one.
Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:33:22 +0900
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi all,
Hi Charles,
> the "compat" example in this thread is a good indication of the good
> reasons to be cautious with CDBS. This said, many of the programs we
> package are very simple, and I think that
Le Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:40:09PM +0100, David Paleino a écrit :
> Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:51:25 +0900
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > (By the way, I am swiching a lot of packages to CDBS; if it is an issue,
> > I am of course open to discussion. I am usually doing th
[I'm forewarding this to debian-devel because this seems to be the
right list for this kind of issues.]
Short intro for debian-devel: We are discussion about including GT.M,
a free MUMPS implementation available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fis-gtm
into Debian to be able to package
Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:45:11 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Well, I do not really know whether this point has to be covered by
> policy. Probably not. If we decide to do so, why not
>
> `grep -v '^#' debian/rules | wc -l` -le 17
>
> This leaves as much
Hi again!
2008/2/11 Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hum...
> I created the compat file because I saw this message while building muscle:
>
> dh_clean: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
>
> But looking at the log there is an "echo 5 >debian/compat" before it
> starts to bui
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:46 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here it is talking about _documentation_ referring to latest compatibility
> level. It does not say that CDBS uses the highest compatibility level
> available. Or did I miss something?
On Feb 11, 2008 10:50 AM, Andreas Tille
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
From debhelper manpage:
Unless otherwise indicated, all debhelper documentation assumes that you
are using the most recent compatibility level, and in most cases does not
indicate if the behavior is different in an earlier com
Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:42:31 -0200
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi!
Hi Nelson,
> On Feb 11, 2008 10:16 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the package
Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:51:25 +0900
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > Modified: trunk/packages/muscle/trunk/debian/watch
> > ===
> > --- trunk/packages/muscle/trunk/debian/watch
> > +++ trunk/packages/muscle/tru
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:16 AM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
> > because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
> > the backporting issues.
>
>
Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:51:25 +0900
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> (By the way, I am swiching a lot of packages to CDBS; if it is an issue,
> I am of course open to discussion. I am usually doing this only if the
> resulting debian/rules files is really minimal).
(I don't
Andreas --
Comments below.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
On Feb 7, 2008 4:09 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
>
> > GT.M is bootstrapped. Just like you need a gcc to build a gcc, only the
> > dependency is not as strong. Remember that GT.M is both a l
Hallo Gert,
we are almost finished with our preparations -
we'll need no more than 1 or 2 weeks, I guess.
Of course you are welcome to stop by when you
are in Leipzig...
Best,
Gaby
Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hello Gabi,
>
>
>>I think that your suggestion is very good:
>>we will re-name our vista
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 10:40 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:51:25 +0900
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > (By the way, I am swiching a lot of packages to CDBS; if it is an issue,
> > I am of course open to discussion. I am usually doi
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
the backporting issues.
Ah, this is interesting. Did I missed a piece of documentation?
I'd be in favour of de
Hello Gabi,
>I think that your suggestion is very good:
> we will re-name our vista-library to 'lipsia_io',
> and so there will be no conflict.
I guess, the main question now is, when can you release this library?
Considering the integration of my code, I'll be in Leipzig most of
March, so we c
Hi!
On Feb 11, 2008 9:51 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nelson, thank you for the upload.
You are welcome.
> Actually, I tend to remove debian/compat in the packages using CDBS,
> because in that case it uses the highest value available, thus solving
> the backporting issues.
Hi all,
I reproduce the behaviour here as well. Maybe there is some kind of
timeout happening with upstream's website? I have filed a bug on uscan
just in case (#465384)
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
21 matches
Mail list logo
