On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I cannot reproduce here. Can anyone else reproduce that issue ?
Probably not. It was just me so forget it.
I have seen that the doc-base file is wrong - probably because I
missinterpreted the doc-base documentation about more than one
document
HMMer directly ships with a variant of squid itself. We noticed some functions
to have
been added. So, instead of hmmer suggesting biosquid, it could actually provide
it.
Upstream was unsure about the degree of compatibility himselfasked about a
year ago.
I cannot recall Infernal to ship
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:05:34PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
HMMer directly ships with a variant of squid itself. We noticed some
functions to have
been added. So, instead of hmmer suggesting biosquid, it could actually
provide it.
Sounds
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Squid is two different things:
- a C library, which we do not package.
- some utilities built (statically?) with this C library,
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:45:10PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Squid is two different things:
- a C library, which we do not
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Steffen Moeller a écrit :
Charles Plessy wrote:
I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so
the
hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Is there an ITP for HMMER3 already?
Hmm… Since the package's name is hmmer
Charles Plessy wrote:
I just checked the HMMER3 sources, and they do not contain (bio)squid, so the
hmmer-squid would not have a long life.
Is there an ITP for HMMER3 already?
[...]
We will face similar situations in the future. Maybe we need a dedicated page
on our website?
Should
By the way, another of our packages have a serious problem :(
Have a nice day,
-- Charles
Le Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:49:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
severity 512371 grave
forwarded 512371 https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20475
thanks
Le Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:00:58AM
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:48:40PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Greetings, Debtags developpers, and happy new year !
I would be really interested in reading your answer to the mail I posted last
September:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2008-September/001841.html
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org
Dear all,
I will package Bio::PrimerDesigner, which is yet another dependancy of Gbrowse,
the generic genome browser. I already injected the prospective package in the
pkg-perl Subversion repository.
Have a nice day,
--
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Enrico Zini wrote:
as far as software is concerned, that software may work with. I can't
think of anything like that, so I'd go with biological-sequence at the
moment, and we're always in time to rename it later.
Sounds reasonable.
works-with::graphs would probably
11 matches
Mail list logo
