Andreas Tille wrote:
> in October last year there was a longish discussion about name space
> pollution regarding plink. If you like to spend some time you should
> read the complete log of #503367 [1].
>
> I decided to put an end now on this issue to make sure it will
> not remain as is for eve
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Two questions are left on my side:
1. On the one hand plink upstream claimed on their website[3] that
Debian *has* renamed plink to snplink (which is not really true
because the discussion ended without any real action). But Gentoo
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In the application to be posted in the SoC web interface
> (http://socghop.appspot.com), please present yourself as you did in this
> email,
> and explain briefly with your own words why you think that the project you
> selected is interest
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[..]
> > What about using /usr/bin/PLINK? I can't find a requirement in the
> > policy to use lowercase characters for a binary/script. Maybe I missed
> > it?
>
> A Plink was discussed and refused [1]
IMO just changing one charact
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 10:23 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> What about using /usr/bin/PLINK?
please god no. try to find a name that removes confusion, not one that
is ugly but still as generic.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
Hi,
I just added the WNPP bug number to the tasks file where we just had an
entry for nipy in imaging-dev. Thanks for the ITP Yaroslav!
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name
6 matches
Mail list logo
