Hi!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Could someone please sponsor the pvrg package, I have cleanup the
> remaining lintian issues.
Not fully clean :-)
See the attached lintian output.
Wouldn't it be better to have the source package and the binary
package as "pvrg-jpe
'lo,
Could someone please sponsor the pvrg package, I have cleanup the
remaining lintian issues.
Thanks !
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
>> 2. Did you build it with pbuilder? I tried, but failed:
> ...
>> [ 85%] *.java -> jar
>> File vtk/*.java is missing
>
> I have seen it happens sporadically. This has to do with parallel
> building, if you turn it off, you'll see it is b
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> 1. The comments in Bug #531174 suggest to modify the Build-Depends line
>> for mono-devel to:
>>
>> mono-devel (>= 2.0) [!alpha !hppa !m68k]
BTW, I have been re-re
Steve,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> 1. The comments in Bug #531174 suggest to modify the Build-Depends line
> for mono-devel to:
>
> mono-devel (>= 2.0) [!alpha !hppa !m68k]
or in the forwarded message from Micro Bauer:
...
That would work, or do the opposite and
5 matches
Mail list logo
