Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:47:12PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi Andreas and Steffen, > > Taking a new upstream release as an opportunity, I have made a lot of > modifications to the mummer package. The current version in Debian relies > heavily on patches that are not documented and not alway

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-07-02 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:47:12PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/mummer/3.20-3/01sm_src_tigr.diff > > See > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2007/11/msg00045.html Hi A

conditional dh-install

2009-07-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi there Once again I am struggling to make gdcm compile on some Arch. For instance on alpha, I am getting: https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gdcm gdcm/alpha failing reason: [Category: none] > dh_install > --sourcedir=/build/buildd-gdcm_2.0.12-1-alpha-lrSEzc/gdcm-2.0.12/deb

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:11:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > >http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2007/11/msg00045.html > > Hi Andreas, > > I tried to google further and found no explication about the buffer overflow > that this patch is preventing. Do you have something useful in your ma

Re: conditional dh-install

2009-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:41:15PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Once again I am struggling to make gdcm compile on some Arch. For > instance on alpha, I am getting: I have to admit I never had to fight this kind of struggles. Seems you deserver the Debian Med architecture fighting hero. ;-)

Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-07-02 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:25:43PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I found online a recommendation for libtool libraries to use the > > CURRENT:REVISION:AGE standard. > > > > That's fine, I used 4:0:0. > > > > But where do the header files go ? > > > > is it to /usr/include/gtextutils-4.0.0

Re: About FASTX-Toolkit and its possible redistribution in Debian.

2009-07-02 Thread Assaf Gordon
Michael Banck wrote, On 07/02/2009 03:01 PM: Is 4.0 the version of the package or really the library version? Note that both are not supposed to be connected to each other. Thanks for clarifying this. I'm new in the ways of packaging and dynamic libraries, and apparently I got it wrong. S