Le Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:11:20AM +0200, debianpmd a écrit :
> does somebody now a free software Open Source for monitoring of body mass
> index of children ?
Hello,
we redistribute ‘Pondus’, but it seems that it does not calculate BMI:
http://www.ephys.de/software/pondus/
Please let us know
Hello,
does somebody now a free software Open Source for monitoring of body mass
index of children ?
Best wishes,
Dr Desombre Pierre-Marie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
In <200907281303.42301@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>In <20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>> > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely
>>> > considered user-friendl
In <20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely
>> > considered user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not
>> > ready for upstream in its curre
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
>> unusual
>> post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the
>> use
Hello,
Stefano, I got the following comments to our post-install message for the
autodock package.
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
>> unusual
>> post-inst messa
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
> unusual
> post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the
> users that
> upstream needs funding to maintain their software.
I h
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely considered
> > user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not ready for upstream
> > in its current state.
>
> Hi, thank you for the comment.
>
> I will sto
Hello,
in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat
unusual
post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the users
that
upstream needs funding to maintain their software.
The respective preliminary code I have just checked in. Upstream had (
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:28:36PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> The linker actually cares about the library interface, not the library
> version.
>
> If you remove or change interface, Debian will have to rev the library
> version (e.g. from libstaden-read.so.1 to libstaden-read.so.2),
> regardle
10 matches
Mail list logo