Re: BMI

2009-07-28 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:11:20AM +0200, debianpmd a écrit : > does somebody now a free software Open Source for monitoring of body mass > index of children ? Hello, we redistribute ‘Pondus’, but it seems that it does not calculate BMI: http://www.ephys.de/software/pondus/ Please let us know

BMI

2009-07-28 Thread debianpmd
Hello, does somebody now a free software Open Source for monitoring of body mass index of children ? Best wishes, Dr Desombre Pierre-Marie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-07-28 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <200907281303.42301@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >In <20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote: >>On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >>> > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely >>> > considered user-friendl

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-07-28 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu>, Andreas Tille wrote: >On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely >> > considered user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not >> > ready for upstream in its curre

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat >> unusual >> post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the >> use

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, Stefano, I got the following comments to our post-install message for the autodock package. Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: >> in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat >> unusual >> post-inst messa

Re: post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat > unusual > post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the > users that > upstream needs funding to maintain their software. I h

Re: MUMmer patches and Artistic license.

2009-07-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely considered > > user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not ready for upstream > > in its current state. > > Hi, thank you for the comment. > > I will sto

post-inst message for autodock

2009-07-28 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, in the sake of our group maintenance I want to inform you about a somewhat unusual post-inst message that I had added to the autodock package, toinform the users that upstream needs funding to maintain their software. The respective preliminary code I have just checked in. Upstream had (

Re: Imported io-lib, a Staden library

2009-07-28 Thread James Bonfield
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:28:36PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > The linker actually cares about the library interface, not the library > version. > > If you remove or change interface, Debian will have to rev the library > version (e.g. from libstaden-read.so.1 to libstaden-read.so.2), > regardle