On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:03:09 AM Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Sorry for saying the obvious here, but if the bug is not
> > Debian-specific, then it should go to ITK upstream.
I definitely encourage that patches for upstre
> > I would have loved to come
> > but have no funds for travel atm... Michael might be interested and he
> > is closer.
> You could at least try to ask DPL if funding is possible.
good idea -- we haven't buzzed him in a while about money, so might be a
good reason ;) Will do
Cheers,
--
=--
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:33:03AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> FWIW: needless to remind that (neuro) imaging is where NeuroDebian's
> interests overlap greatly, and we have been taking care about
> maintaining a few related projects.
Sure. I always considered most NeuroDebian packages as
Hi Andreas,
FWIW: needless to remind that (neuro) imaging is where NeuroDebian's
interests overlap greatly, and we have been taking care about
maintaining a few related projects. I would have loved to come
but have no funds for travel atm... Michael might be interested and he
is closer.
Cheers,
Hi,
last years Debian Med meeting was more or less dedicated to
microbiology. However, there is a chance to also gather people from
other fields like medical practice or medical imaging (or whatever your
favourite Debian Med topic might be).
If there is any interest to gather more than one perso
On 11/10/2011 10:23 AM, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:03:09 AM Steffen Möller wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>> On 11/10/2011 09:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:11AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
I am currently working with upstream to get s
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:03:09 AM Steffen Möller wrote:
Hi all,
> On 11/10/2011 09:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:11AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> >> I am currently working with upstream to get some problems corrected.
> >> Turns out that part of the
On 11/10/2011 09:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:11AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
>> I am currently working with upstream to get some problems corrected. Turns
>> out
>> that part of the problem is that e.g. ITK would need patches.
>>
>> How would you consider the
[Putting relevant bug report in CC]
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:11AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> I am currently working with upstream to get some problems corrected. Turns
> out
> that part of the problem is that e.g. ITK would need patches.
>
> How would you consider the chances t
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:49:11AM +0100, Hilbert, Sebastian wrote:
> I am currently working with upstream to get some problems corrected. Turns
> out
> that part of the problem is that e.g. ITK would need patches.
Nothing new there.
> How would you consider the chances that those patches find
[answer on list after stripping possibly not public stuff]
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:42:46AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> One way out will be to make one of the (bio-)medical distributions so
> superior
> that all effort by other distros is stopped at the mere thought of it.
While it
11 matches
Mail list logo
