Re: Again: Git help needed [Was: Re: Bug#661403: sitplus: FTBFS with libconfig9]

2012-03-05 Thread Olivier Sallou
Le 3/4/12 9:43 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi, I would like update sitplus to new upstream version but I admit I have no idea how to properly inject the new upstream version into the Git repository. The command suggested in policy Example commands to track new branches leads to $

Re: Somethink for us? [Was: lammps_0~20120228.git268a14f-1_i386.changes is NEW]

2012-03-05 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, On 03/05/2012 08:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: is this something we should suggest for biologists? Somewhat on the periphery. I suggest to leave it with Debian Science. Best, Steffen (new) lammps-doc_0~20120228.git268a14f-1_all.deb extra doc Molecular Dynamics Simulator. Documentation

Re: Refactoring source packaging, Linux specific

2012-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:55:34AM +0100, Eric MAEKER wrote: No problem thanks I still have to work on the freediams package. The source decompress the freemedforms-0.7.0.beta2 not the freediams-0.7.0.beta2 path so it cannot compile the freediams app. I think something like rules: %:

Re: Bug#662513: RM: emboss/6.3.1-6

2012-03-05 Thread Tim Booth
Hi Charles, I'll be up at the EBI in a couple of weeks. Is there anything I can do to try and persuade them to grant an acceptable license or has this already been tried? EMBOSS is a software package that I still consider to be very important, even though development is currently stalled due to

Re: Bug#662513: RM: emboss/6.3.1-6

2012-03-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:51:35AM +, Tim Booth a écrit : I'll be up at the EBI in a couple of weeks. Is there anything I can do to try and persuade them to grant an acceptable license or has this already been tried? EMBOSS is a software package that I still consider to be very

libsnappy (Was: Bug#662513: RM: emboss/6.3.1-6)

2012-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Charles, On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:25:40PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: By the way: one of the reasons I have not updated emboss is also that I am stuck with other packaging works, in particular libsnappy-java where I have reached my level of incompetence (http://bugs.debian.org/636181).

Re: libsnappy (Was: Bug#662513: RM: emboss/6.3.1-6)

2012-03-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:49:21PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:25:40PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: By the way: one of the reasons I have not updated emboss is also that I am stuck with other packaging works, in particular libsnappy-java where I have

Re: libsnappy (Was: Bug#662513: RM: emboss/6.3.1-6)

2012-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Charles, On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:03:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: it is just that problem solved or not, I did not manage to go further. I spent tens of hours on this package, and still from one work session to the other, I do not remember or understand what I did for making the

Re: Plans for ITK version 4

2012-03-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On i386, seven tests segfault which I can reproduce on my machine in a 32-bit chroot. and those segfaults seems to go back to FFT facilities: As with 4.0.0, it builds and tests OK on my amd64, but has not yet been successful on any other architecture [1] although some builds have not yet

Re: Refactoring source packaging, Linux specific

2012-03-05 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 5 mars 2012 à 11:47, Andreas Tille a écrit : On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:55:34AM +0100, Eric MAEKER wrote: No problem thanks I still have to work on the freediams package. The source decompress the freemedforms-0.7.0.beta2 not the freediams-0.7.0.beta2 path so it cannot compile the

Re: libsnappy (Was: Bug#662513: RM: emboss/6.3.1-6)

2012-03-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:09:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: git clone git+ssh://ti...@git.debian.org/git/users/plessy/snappy-java.git First, I confirm that the package builds well in a chroot (but not on my dirty machine). Thanks. 1. Create a fresh Git archive (in Debian Med)