Re: Ping: Help for non-technical task needed (Was: License of colt [colt_1.2.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2012-08-13 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
Le 8/10/12 2:18 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi Olivier (or whoever else might lurk un FB) On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:07:53AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: Perhaps I'm wrong but I found the following:

status on picard-tools and issue with libsnappy-java

2012-08-13 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
I copy below the answer from upstream team. They will not go to latest snappy version. Seems it was quite difficult to integrate it and faced issues. The problem is snappy-java 1.0.4 breaks its API and is not compatible with version 1.0.3 used by picard-tools. At runtime, picard-tools tries to

Re: Ping: Help for non-technical task needed (Was: License of colt [colt_1.2.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2012-08-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:15:47AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I have sent a message via Facebook to one of the author but I am afraid that it will be complicated Any answer from colt author? No, no answer. :-( Is it possible to obtain any valid e-mail address at

Re: status on picard-tools and issue with libsnappy-java

2012-08-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:27:50AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I copy below the answer from upstream team. They will not go to latest snappy version. Seems it was quite difficult to integrate it and faced issues. The problem is snappy-java 1.0.4 breaks its API and is not

Re: status on picard-tools and issue with libsnappy-java

2012-08-13 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
Le 8/13/12 11:08 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit : On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:27:50AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I copy below the answer from upstream team. They will not go to latest snappy version. Seems it was quite difficult to integrate it and faced issues. The problem is

Re: Ping: Help for non-technical task needed (Was: License of colt [colt_1.2.0~dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2012-08-13 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
Le 8/13/12 10:58 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit : On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:15:47AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I have sent a message via Facebook to one of the author but I am afraid that it will be complicated Any answer from colt author? No, no answer. :-( Is it

Re: status on picard-tools and issue with libsnappy-java

2012-08-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30:12PM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr a écrit : Too bad We could indeed package a libsnappy1.0.3-java (with a conflict on libsnappy-java, and a recommends on picard-tools) and make picard-tools depend on this version. Hi Olivier and Andreas, first of all,

Re: status on picard-tools and issue with libsnappy-java

2012-08-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10 Popcon users, of which I already contribute 2 or 3 points because I develop on multiple machines, we can also do something very dark side, that is a) downgrade libsnappy-java to

Re: status on picard-tools and issue with libsnappy-java

2012-08-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:35:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : Could you please exlpain again the advantage of having libsnappy for the picard-tools user? It accelerates some operations by compressing temporary data on the fly. The upstream website mentions a time reduction of 25 %.