Le 12 févr. 2014 15:41, "Andreas Tille" a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:11:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06:42AM -0500, James McCoy a écrit :
> > >
> > > That being said, I don't have access to most of the packages. Even
if I
> > > did, it feels
I would like to appropriately thank [1] the packagers that have put
the effort in making this happen, and re-iterate that collaborations
with upstream for any issues that arise are welcome and encouraged.
Thanks,
Matt
[1] http://opensource.com/business/14/2/thank-a-linux-packager-today
On Fri, F
On 02/21/2014 02:17 PM, Olivier Sallou wrote:
On 02/21/2014 02:11 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
Hi All,
The new version of bowtie2 was released recently and it seems that it
works only on 64 bit platforms.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/bowtie2.git;a=blob;f=Makefile
lines 141-
On 02/21/2014 02:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since both packages bowtie (1.0!) and tophat stopped building from
> source since we switched to seqan 1.4 (both bug reports in CC) and
> upstream of both programs did not responded since > three weeks I wonder
> whether we should reintroduce
Dear all,
now that itk-4.5 is in unstable I was wondering how is the status on
compiling in the python support?
Since we need this I will put some effort into getting the python-itk
package, but there are lot of options regarding the python bindings
(dimensions, supported pixel types, ...) s
Hi,
From the Bio-Linux point of view Mothur replaced Dotur years ago. I'd
be very surprised if any scripts depend on running the dotur program
directly. Happy to see it go.
Cheers,
TIM
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 14:23 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the last call for opinions about
Hi,
this is the last call for opinions about dotur. Upstream does recommend
to use mothur instead. Please raise your hand if you keep on using
dotur for whatever reason or it will be removed from Debian.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:56:42PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrot
Hi,
since both packages bowtie (1.0!) and tophat stopped building from
source since we switched to seqan 1.4 (both bug reports in CC) and
upstream of both programs did not responded since > three weeks I wonder
whether we should reintroduce a seqan 1.3 package to be able to build
the packages agai
Hi All,
The new version of bowtie2 was released recently and it seems that it
works only on 64 bit platforms.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/bowtie2.git;a=blob;f=Makefile
lines 141-143.
Could anybody please have a look or try to build for i386 the source to
confirm/disprove
On 02/21/2014 02:11 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The new version of bowtie2 was released recently and it seems that it
> works only on 64 bit platforms.
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/bowtie2.git;a=blob;f=Makefile
>
>
> lines 141-143.
If program is coded to suppor
Hi Mathias,
thanks for your quick response.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:20:28PM +, Kuhring, Mathias wrote:
> I don't know about every binary, but I used blat, pslPretty, pslReps and
> pslSort on and a regular basis and they will all execute on their own. They
> don't need the web service par
11 matches
Mail list logo
