> > nd_build nd+debian wheezy i386 ...
>
> > but the dependencies could not be resolved. Could it be that you
> > backported a gccxml but didn't upload it to the neurodebian repo yet?
>
> That is strange since if you used that command, it should have resulted
> in identical environment (given
Yes, that was misleading to me! I saw the build success on i386 and I thought
the fix was "do the test but always succeed, with print of the failures".
So fine, we will see what ubuntu people do for fixing the issue :-)
cheers,
Gianfranco
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hello Yaroslav,
> On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:33 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > I have (again) tried to provide a backport build of itk4 for wheezy (to
> > be shipped from NeuroDebian) and got those 2 tests to fail.
> > 926 - itkTIFFImageIO
On May 29, 2014 12:26:43 PM Gert Wollny wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:48 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Yes, but wasn't the upload something like
> > "do the test, but just print them and don't fail if tests fails?"
>
> No, never. The tests are there to make sure that the code is prop
Hello Yaroslav,
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:33 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I have (again) tried to provide a backport build of itk4 for wheezy (to
> be shipped from NeuroDebian) and got those 2 tests to fail.
>
> 926 - itkTIFFImageIOCompression_RGBTestImageJPEG_JPEG (Failed)
>
Andreas,
Could you please give us a hint on the libics status ?
Thanks much
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusw3bthtqhopqtgbqog0hputkdf-h-xrd
Hi Guys,
I have (again) tried to provide a backport build of itk4 for wheezy (to
be shipped from NeuroDebian) and got those 2 tests to fail.
926 - itkTIFFImageIOCompression_RGBTestImageJPEG_JPEG (Failed)
2168 - itkOtsuThresholdImageFilterTestShort (Failed)
Would you be so kind to
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:48 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Yes, but wasn't the upload something like
> "do the test, but just print them and don't fail if tests fails?"
No, never. The tests are there to make sure that the code is properly
compiled and linked, if the tests fail we have a prob
Yes, but wasn't the upload something like
"do the test, but just print them and don't fail if tests fails?"
I see the build has failed
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/insighttoolkit4/4.5.2-2/+build/6047212
Maybe in override_dh_auto_tests you should return 0 instead of 1?
Just guessing
che
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:07 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Really thanks to you both, however I'm not sure the patch works...
> there is a build failure of the new version right now on ubuntu
>
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/176467732/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-amd64.insighttoolkit4_4.5.2-2_F
Really thanks to you both, however I'm not sure the patch works...
there is a build failure of the new version right now on ubuntu
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/176467732/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-amd64.insighttoolkit4_4.5.2-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
cheers,
Gianfranco
> Il Mercoledì 28 Maggi
11 matches
Mail list logo