Re: Orthanc 0.8.5

2014-11-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastien, thanks for your preparation. I did some minor change in debian/watch to properly deal with the +dfsg suffix and uploaded to experimental. Please do not misunderstand this: The package is definitely not more "experimental" than the other versions. However, we are now in freeze time

Orthanc 0.8.5

2014-11-04 Thread Sebastien Jodogne
Dear all, I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream version of Orthanc (0.8.5) [1]. Orthanc is a lightweight, scriptable DICOM server for healthcare and medical research [2]. Andreas, if the package looks OK to you, please would you kindly upload it to unstable? T

Re: mapsembler2 FTBS #765285 question

2014-11-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Olivier, On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:55:54AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > On 11/04/2014 09:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > The only way to get this mapsembler2 version in is to either close the > > bug or decrease the severity. A new upload will keep mapsembler2 out > > from Jessie. > FTBS

Re: mapsembler2 FTBS #765285 question

2014-11-04 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 11/04/2014 09:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> Hi, >> after the discussions we had about mapsembler2 failing to build on a few >> archs, I have made a RM request on failing archs: >> #766961: RM: mapsembler2 [mips m

Re: mapsembler2 FTBS #765285 question

2014-11-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Olivier, On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > Hi, > after the discussions we had about mapsembler2 failing to build on a few > archs, I have made a RM request on failing archs: > #766961: RM: mapsembler2 [mips mipsel powerpc sparc] -- RoM; FTBFS > > Indeed failures

mapsembler2 FTBS #765285 question

2014-11-04 Thread Olivier Sallou
Hi, after the discussions we had about mapsembler2 failing to build on a few archs, I have made a RM request on failing archs: #766961: RM: mapsembler2 [mips mipsel powerpc sparc] -- RoM; FTBFS Indeed failures are due to upstream code not working on those archs. Bug #765285 is in severity seious