Hi,
I have started packaging Tide (a tandard tool for ass-spectroscopy) at
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/tide.git
Unfortunately these days gcc is more picky about C++ syntax and I was
running into
g++ -ggdb -O6 -DNDEBUG -I./protoobj -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
Hi,
> g++ -ggdb -O6 -DNDEBUG -I./protoobj -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> -Werror=format-security -o obj-opt-x86_64/test_spectrum_preprocess.o -c
> src/test_spectrum_preprocess.cc
> In file included from src/test_spectrum_preprocess.cc:8:0:
> src/records.h: In destructor
Hi Martin and Anke,
(I'm writing by wearing my Debian maintainer hut but we can talk about
this also via internal phone - I just want to get Filippo involved since
he might have a good overview abou this topic.)
I have created Debian packaging code for pipasic[1] which creates a
working Debian
Hi Sergio,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:12:23PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
> A quick look at Blends tells me that maybe this software could fit in
> the 'Medical data' task (because its purpose is to analyse the data
> generated by CPAP machines), although 'Tools' is a good option as
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:03 PM Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:42:27AM +, Michael Crusoe a écrit :
> > gbp clone git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/snap-aligner.git
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I found non-Free statements in some files under
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:02:10AM +, Michael Crusoe wrote:
>
> Thank you for catching that. They are not used to build, so I've stripped
> them out using Files-excluded in debian/copyright.
>
> Alas, I just discovered that tests/bin/ValidateSamFile.jar doesn't contain
> its source code and
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:11 PM Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:06:31AM +, Michael Crusoe a écrit :
> > transrate-tools is also ready
> >
> > gbp clone git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/transrate-tools.git
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I think that your
Dear all,
While upgrading the orthanc package to the newest upstream version (0.9.4), I
notice that Lintian reports new "source-is-missing" errors:
==
N: Processing source package orthanc (version 0.9.4+dfsg-1, arch source) ...
E: orthanc source: source-is-missing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 778589 ITP: berkeley-express -- Streaming quantification for
> high-throughput sequencing
Bug #778589 {Done: cru...@ucdavis.edu (Michael R. Crusoe)} [wnpp] "ITP:
berkeley-express -- Streaming quantification for high
Changed Bug title to
> > So, the files that are reported to be missing are actually present in the
> > source package.
>
> ... and this is the problem. Lintian considers these files not as
> source package since these are minimized (or lintian considers these as
> minimized). You always need to provide
Hi Anton,
I'll be on leave for the next week and can't commit to get this patch
out soon. Feel free to do it or let the QA team handle it. I will make
sure to re-sync the packaging repository with theirs when I get back.
Cheers,
Ghislain
On 27/09/15 20:37, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Ghislain,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:40:13AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
>
> Having a look at my personal Lintian reports [1], I then notice that these
> errors are also reported to be present on the version 0.9.3. But, I am sure
> that these errors were not reported back in early August 2015 when
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:25:49AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> > > So, the files that are reported to be missing are actually present in the
> > > source package.
> >
> > ... and this is the problem. Lintian considers these files not as
> > source package since these are minimized (or
Hello Andreas,
Thanks to your answers about lintian, I think that Orthanc 0.9.4 is now ready
for upload [1].
Regards,
Sébastien-
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:46:51AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Then the binary package gets the following dependency:
> Depends: libblas.so.3
just in case: leaving out ${shlibs:Depends} here, you will have to take
care of *all* dependencies manually.
in more complex cases you may wish to
On 29/09/15 18:09, Felix Salfelder wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
what is wrong with a builddep on libopenblas-dev|someotherblas-dev?
do you want to discard the second option in case the first is available
(don't know how to do that)?
If I use say
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:19:54AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> ...
> So it looks like I can link something from these approaches to the
> testing migration tracking. Right now, the tracking is implemented as
> watching and parsing the emails.
Thanks for the update. Just let us know if there
OK, so should I commit to QA repo or debian-science.
Anton
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015 schrieb Ghislain Vaillant :
> Hi Anton,
>
> I'll be on leave for the next week and can't commit to get this patch out
> soon. Feel free to do it or let the QA team handle it. I will make sure to
> re-sync
Hi, all,
Continuing from the previous discussions [1-2], I have just a little bit
to report (though I have not worked on it very much since then,
unfortunately)
My repository is now published at
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/afif-guest/backportd.git/
I appreciate the neurodebian people
Oops, I thought I had renamed the source package to libcereal.
What's the best way to correct this situation? The package is already in
the NEW queue: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/cereal_1.1.2-1.html
20 matches
Mail list logo