Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:36:40AM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > While the Common Workflow Language grew out of the bioinformatics community > it has seen uptake in the neuroimaging community and is theoretically > useful in other fields and outside science. So it should be added not only to med-

Re: ELIXIR tools registry participation - richer metadata for our packages

Hi, I'd like to add to this old thread some results of a later meeting in Copenhagen - our Debian Med sprint last week kindly sponsored by DTU. I confirm that I took over edam data files in Debian Med packages into UDD. You can easily query all these data by a script I provided on Github: h

Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

While the Common Workflow Language grew out of the bioinformatics community it has seen uptake in the neuroimaging community and is theoretically useful in other fields and outside science. Sâm, 13 feb. 2016, 07:53, Andreas Tille a scris: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:39:39AM +, Michael Cruso

Re: libcereal updated with patch to increase arch support from upstream

Uploaded and tagged. Thanks for your work on this. Andreas. On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:41:55AM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > I've updated a -4 version that drops the -multilib builddep as suggested by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814530 > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 P

Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:39:39AM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > Thanks for the reminder :-) > > Go for it! > > The draft package is at git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/cwltool.git > [ I just pushed it ] I'm not sure whether cwltool belongs to the Debian Med tasks - at least the descrip

Re: libcereal updated with patch to increase arch support from upstream

I've updated a -4 version that drops the -multilib builddep as suggested by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814530 On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:35 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Done (some time ago - Steffen, I guess you lost ;-) ) and tagged as well. > Thanks for your work on this >

Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

Thanks for the reminder :-) Go for it! The draft package is at git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/cwltool.git [ I just pushed it ] On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM Steffen Möller wrote: > @Michael in particular, > > I need to run a yet not completely defined NGS workflow on some ~30 > nuc

cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

@Michael in particular, I need to run a yet not completely defined NGS workflow on some ~30 nucleotides read-length single-ended FASTQ files to determine expression levels. I thought that it would be very nice to learn about cwl on the way. I know your package for the cwltool is almost there but c

Re: libcereal updated with patch to increase arch support from upstream

Done (some time ago - Steffen, I guess you lost ;-) ) and tagged as well. Thanks for your work on this Andreas. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:13:03PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > Can I get a sponsorship? > > Thanks! > -- > Michael R. Crusoe CWL Community Engineer cru...@ucdavis.edu >

Re: RFS: indelible 1.03-2

done Best, Steffen On 12/02/16 11:40, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated indelible to feature a brand new man page. Now the package > should be lintian-free. Would someone kindly sponsor? > > Just wondering, which timestamp is supposed to be under a changelog > entry, the day I started a

RFS: indelible 1.03-2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I updated indelible to feature a brand new man page. Now the package should be lintian-free. Would someone kindly sponsor? Just wondering, which timestamp is supposed to be under a changelog entry, the day I started a new version, or its uplo