Re: detecting the presence of new files / licenses / copyrights

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:32 PM Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi, > > > http://sources.debian.net/src/amtterm/1.4-1/debian/rules/?hl=4#L4 > > > > Has anyone used this technique in practice? > > Not yet, but it looks useful in case things change. Unfortunately doesn’t > help

Re: detecting the presence of new files / licenses / copyrights

Hi, > http://sources.debian.net/src/amtterm/1.4-1/debian/rules/?hl=4#L4 > > Has anyone used this technique in practice? Not yet, but it looks useful in case things change. Unfortunately doesn’t help with getting the licenses in to begin with... Thanks for the pointer, Sascha

detecting the presence of new files / licenses / copyrights

http://sources.debian.net/src/amtterm/1.4-1/debian/rules/?hl=4#L4 Has anyone used this technique in practice? -- Michael R. Crusoe CWL Community Engineer cru...@ucdavis.edu Common Workflow Language projectUniversity of California, Davis

GSoC: Continuous Integration for all biological applications inside Debian

Hi, I just added a GSoC project for the Debian Med team. Please have a look on the according Wiki page. https://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2016/Projects/BioToolsTesting Please make some noise amongst bioinformatic students to get good candidates. Kind regards Andreas. --

My sprint report (Was: Annual Debian Med sprint: 04.-07. February 2016 in Copenhagen)

Hi, I'd like to give a short report about our Debian Med sprint. Thanks to the invitation of ELIXIR-DK we stayed in a nice hotel close to Copenhagen. Despite the close location to the Danish capital it felt like in the middle of nowhere in the woods between two lakes - a great place for not

Re: Mentioning EDAM files in DebianMed Policy

Hi again, I'd be happy if someone would take over the job suggested by Fabian to mention EDAM fields in our policy. I personally do not feel capable to do this since I'm simply lacking the biologic background. We also should have a record inside Debian Wiki to document what we drop into the

Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

Hi Afif, On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:23:27AM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > :) So is there no problem to edit tasks pages for other blends to add > packages we maintain? I'd like to avoid the term "other" when we talk about Blends. A Blend should make sense and if we packaged something in our

Re: RFS: python-pbh5tools (new binary package)

على الأحد 14 شباط 2016 ‫23:55، كتب Andreas Tille: > Uploaded. Thanks for your work on this. Thanks for sponsoring. > Andreas (who seems to have > control over usual mail address again ...) > Cool. I will stop CC'ing you, then. Many thanks and regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي

Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

Hello, على الأحد 14 شباط 2016 ‫23:49، كتب Andreas Tille: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:27:40PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >>> So it should be added not only to med-bio but also to med-imaging, >>> right? >> >> Shouldn't it rather be put into the Debian Science Tools task [1] >> together with