Re: biosquid fix for #815883, please review & upload

2016-02-25 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hello, على الخميس 25 شباط 2016 ‫15:03، كتب Sascha Steinbiss: > Hi all, > > I have prepared a fix for #815883 in SVN and also updated the package to > current standards. Could someone sponsor a team upload please? > You should be able to upload this one. Thanks for squashing the bug! regards A

Re: RFS: reapr

2016-02-25 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hello, على الخميس 25 شباط 2016 ‫10:34، كتب Sascha Steinbiss: > Hey, > >> [...] >>> and builds reproducibly. >> >> Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different >> binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down >> further for now. > > OK, it was just a ccac

biosquid fix for #815883, please review & upload

2016-02-25 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, I have prepared a fix for #815883 in SVN and also updated the package to current standards. Could someone sponsor a team upload please? Thanks, Sascha

Re: RFS: reapr

2016-02-25 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hey, > [...] >> and builds reproducibly. > > Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different > binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down > further for now. OK, it was just a ccache issue in my reproducibility testing setup. The package is fine! Cheers

Re: RFS: reapr

2016-02-25 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi again, [...] > and builds reproducibly. Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down further for now. I'll try to get in touch with the r-b team later. However, I don't consider this an upload blocker at the

RFS: reapr

2016-02-25 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, with all required dependencies in place now and with a proper test case I think REAPR is ready for upload. Code is in git, could anyone take a look please? The package has no lintian errors/warnings, has build time tests as well as autopkgtests, and builds reproducibly. Many thanks, Sasch