Re: [fis-gtm] "action needed" items

2016-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:32:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Just uploaded. Will be in unstable after the next mirror sync. I forgot that due to the name change of the binary package it needs to pass the new queue. To my experience processing of the new queue is faster these days than for in

Re: [fis-gtm] "action needed" items

2016-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Amul, On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:59:59AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 03/31/16 06:05, Andreas Tille wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:17:52PM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: > >>FIS released GT.M V6.3-000 yesterday and I am in the process of updating the > >>Debian package. Since I

Re: [fis-gtm] "action needed" items

2016-03-31 Thread Amul Shah
Hi Andreas, On 03/31/16 06:05, Andreas Tille wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:17:52PM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: FIS released GT.M V6.3-000 yesterday and I am in the process of updating the Debian package. Since I have the spare cycles, I want to address a few of the "action needed" items listed

Re: Parallel software performance analysis

2016-03-31 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
Hello Jonathan, The Debian-Med team is considering plans for optimising large parts of the scientific software in Debian /en masse/. Many of the participants work for EU organisation. I'm sure they would appreciate your participation: https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2016/03/msg00152.html Ch

Re: Proposal to start link time optimisation for Debian Med packages

2016-03-31 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Steffen Möller] > @Petter, Holger: For packages featuring LTO, would you consider it > reasonable to run those twice in the CI, i.e. with and without the LTO > optimisation? I doubt ci.debian.net is the right tool for this, as it is supposed to run tests on the installed packages, not during buil

Re: Proposal to start link time optimisation for Debian Med packages

2016-03-31 Thread Steffen Möller
On 31/03/16 02:34, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit : >> I had started this friendly and constructive thread on Debian Devel on >> link time optimisation >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/03/msg00399.html >> >> and my personal

Re: [fis-gtm] "action needed" items

2016-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Amul, On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:17:52PM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: > FIS released GT.M V6.3-000 yesterday and I am in the process of updating the > Debian package. Since I have the spare cycles, I want to address a few of > the "action needed" items listed on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fis-gt

Re: Proposal to start link time optimisation for Debian Med packages

2016-03-31 Thread Fabian Klötzl
Hi all, On 30.03.2016 22:28, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >> The promotion of this enhancement I consider to be exceptionally >> important, especially so if we can tie this up with the continuous >> integration testing and some benchmarking. For all the folks that wait >> over some NGS data set to be a