Any change in blastp? (Was: Bug#824048: python-biopython: FTBFS: AssertionError: 10 != 1)

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:35:27PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > ... > Bio.PDB.Selection docstring test ... ok > == > FAIL: test_blastp (test_NCBI_BLAST_tools.Pairwise) > Pairwise BLASTP search >

Re: iva_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Done. Thanks for your work on this and hope your DD application will be finalised soon. Andreas. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi all, > > could I please get DM permissions for this please? There might be new > upstream releases in the making soon... > >

Re: iva_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Hi all, could I please get DM permissions for this please? There might be new upstream releases in the making soon... Thanks Sascha On 10/05/2016 17:04, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Accepted: > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 09:32:57 + > Source: iva > Binary: iva >

Re: GSoC Update

Hi again , I update abstract again thank you for your interest. Best Regards 2016-05-11 9:36 GMT+03:00 Andreas Tille : > Hi Canberk, > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:37:45AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > > Hello Andreas, > > > > I changed the project abstract in the GSoC page

Re: GSoC Update

Hi Canberk, On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:37:45AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > I changed the project abstract in the GSoC page to make it more easy to > understand for everyone. Good idea. > If you want to look here is >