Re: toppred and bowtie now reproducible

2016-05-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sascha, thanks as always for your effort. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:00:32AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > I’ve made toppred and bowtie reproducible and also did the usual housekeeping > (hardening, autopkgtests, …). In git and svn, respectively. I've uploaded toppred. I've looked at bow

toppred and bowtie now reproducible

2016-05-25 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Hi all, I’ve made toppred and bowtie reproducible and also did the usual housekeeping (hardening, autopkgtests, …). In git and svn, respectively. Cheers Sascha

Re: OpenAPS as in Artificial Pancreas System

2016-05-25 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > >>> The former mentioned technical reasons aside I would like to add support > >>> for the political statement that this technology is available and should > >>> become clinical practice. > >> What should or should not become "clini

Re: OpenAPS as in Artificial Pancreas System

2016-05-25 Thread Steffen Möller
On 25/05/16 13:26, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:17:25PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > >>> The former mentioned technical reasons aside I would like to add support >>> for the political statement that this technology is available and should >>> become clinical practice. >>

Re: OpenAPS as in Artificial Pancreas System

2016-05-25 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:17:25PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > The former mentioned technical reasons aside I would like to add support > > for the political statement that this technology is available and should > > become clinical practice. > > What should or should not become "clinical p

Re: OpenAPS as in Artificial Pancreas System

2016-05-25 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > I think to have gathered enough reason in my initial email for a judge to > decide that the intent to package OpenAPS is good and genuine and not > intending to persuade anyone to actually use the software on a patient. I am with y

Re: Aw: Re: OpenAPS as in Artificial Pancreas System

2016-05-25 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > However, if I understand things correctly, this openAPS offers _tools_ > > but not a ready-made solution to run your blood-glucose. So, no > > matter how well we install the package, the user WILL have to > > write their own monit

Re: Aw: Re: OpenAPS as in Artificial Pancreas System

2016-05-25 Thread Steffen Möller
On 24/05/16 19:53, Karsten Hilbert wrote: >> Well, if we try to create a package than we are doing this since we are >> the experts in doing installations and we can do this usually better >> than a random user. We are trying our best to let things perform >> correctly. Imagine we install gpg t

Re: Debian packaging of phylophlan and using vsearch instead of usearch

2016-05-25 Thread Nicola Segata
Hi Adreas, we recently updated PhyloPhlAn to support other usearch versions. I'm CC'ing Francesco (the lead on the project) which can be more accurate on which usearch version we need for the last version of PhyloPhlAn. Regarding other software I think it would be fantastic to have MetaPhlAn2 as