Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs^Wregistries?

2016-06-22 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, On 22/06/16 15:06, Olivier Sallou wrote: > On 06/22/2016 02:12 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> [For readers of Blends list: We are discussing an additional field >> in debian/upstream/metadata ] >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> Our plans are to offer

Re: RFS: odil 0.7.0-1

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:38:35PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: > > Thanks, the builders looks greener now! :-) > I took the liberty of renaming > your tag, since it had an extra "debian/" prefix > ("debian/debian/0.7.0-2" instead of "debian/0.7.0-2"). Uhmmm - I'm happy that we are all free to

Re: Request for discussion: Is our Sprint more of a Mini-DebConf? What to have next?

2016-06-22 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
Dear Steffen, sorry for my late reply -- I have been busy last week with both work and RL and also had to think a little about your suggestions. [...] >> FYI as a side note: I have reached out to informatics people here at >> Sanger during the regular campus-wide Informatics Group Meetings by >>

Re: RFS: odil 0.7.0-1

2016-06-22 Thread Julien Lamy
Le 22/06/2016 à 11:22, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:53:43PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: >> >> Thanks, but since all 32-bit arches failed on the same test (except for >> sh4 on which gcc segfaults and powerpcspe on which a build-dep is >> missing), I'll have to

Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs^Wregistries?

2016-06-22 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 06/22/2016 02:12 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > [For readers of Blends list: We are discussing an additional field > in debian/upstream/metadata ] > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> Our plans are to offer reference to >> * the bio.tools registry (obviously)

Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs^Wregistries?

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
[For readers of Blends list: We are discussing an additional field in debian/upstream/metadata ] On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > Our plans are to offer reference to > * the bio.tools registry (obviously) > * the SeqWiki (since this community feeds the

Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs?

2016-06-22 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Andreas, On 22/06/16 13:03, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Matúš and I are having a mini-sprint together - directly at the baltic >> sea - to get the integration of Debian packages and their annotation >> with the

Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs^Wregistries?

2016-06-22 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello again, just to render it all a bit more tangible: On 22/06/16 11:30, Steffen Möller wrote: > Matúš and I are having a mini-sprint together - directly at the baltic > sea - to get the integration of Debian packages and their annotation > with the bio.tools registry a bit of a push. One

Re: upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs?

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hello, > > Matúš and I are having a mini-sprint together - directly at the baltic > sea - to get the integration of Debian packages and their annotation > with the bio.tools registry a bit of a push. One issue that just came up >

Re: Galaxy project producing their own Debian packages

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Olivier, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57:02AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > extension and can be installed somehow via dpkg/apt is a proper Debian > > package to our standards of quality. It would be really great to get > > proper galaxy packages and possibly integrating the authors of those

Re: Galaxy project producing their own Debian packages

2016-06-22 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 06/22/2016 11:29 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:07:18PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>> Vezi Tweetul lui @natefoo: >>> https://twitter.com/natefoo/status/743306923026440194 >>> >>> https://depot.galaxyproject.org/nate/dpkg/ >>> >> nice, but easy for them.

upstream/metadata with references to software catalogs?

2016-06-22 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, Matúš and I are having a mini-sprint together - directly at the baltic sea - to get the integration of Debian packages and their annotation with the bio.tools registry a bit of a push. One issue that just came up was that the accession number/ID of the uploaded entry should be stored

Re: Galaxy project producing their own Debian packages

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:07:18PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > Vezi Tweetul lui @natefoo: > > https://twitter.com/natefoo/status/743306923026440194 > > > > https://depot.galaxyproject.org/nate/dpkg/ > > > nice, but easy for them. Galaxy installs many things at run time from > remote

Re: RFS: odil 0.7.0-1

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Julien, On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:53:43PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: > > Thanks, but since all 32-bit arches failed on the same test (except for > sh4 on which gcc segfaults and powerpcspe on which a build-dep is > missing), I'll have to apologize for the waste of your time and ask for > a

Please provide source code for Tandem Repeats Finder under a freely redistributable license

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear Gary, I'm writing you on behalf of the Debian Med team which is a subgroup inside Debian with the objective to package free software in the field of biology and medicine for official Debian. Since we intend to package RepeatMasker (see our so called task list in the todo-section[1]) we also

Re: Please provide source code for Tandem Repeats Finder under a freely redistributable license

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yozen, thanks for your hint and understanding - I'll write to Gary Benson. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:12:55PM -0400, Yozen Hernandez wrote: > Dear Michael and the rest of the Debian Medical Team, > > Sorry again for the long response time. I should clarify that I

Re: Infernal Autopkgtest

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Canberk, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:30:23AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > I upload to git infernal thank you for help. Thanks. Uploaded. > I also make a pkgsuite to > Ffindex but i think program have a problem it can't allocate field for > working i try manually . If you want to i can upload

Re: [Outreachy] predictprotein and other RostLab packages

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Good morning Tanya, thanks for your diligent and educated work on the topic. I'm impressed about your performance. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:02:26AM +0300, merlettaia wrote: > First part of this letter is just to inform you, but I also have several > questions about packaging with perl for

Re: Exonerate Test Failures

2016-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Canberk, (I've bounced your mail to the list ...) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:43:06PM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > Actually i dont have a solution because program dont work like they offer. > I can manage to solve this fault it is a bit trick. If i wrote the section > names in a file and give

[Outreachy] predictprotein and other RostLab packages

2016-06-22 Thread merlettaia
Good morning, Andreas (and also all who reads this letter)! First part of this letter is just to inform you, but I also have several questions about packaging with perl for RostLab packages (questions are given at the end of this letter). 0) First of all, this is what I did for now: * Concavity,