Hi Andreas,
I push some changes for deepnano. Used a few poretools data for the
deepnano-data because poretools use pybuild for packaging. When I create
new package in control file (for split packaging) poretools package created
with empty package. I dont want to change the way this package builde
Hi all,
In the short term, I’m actually listed as co-maint on Bio-Graphics and
BioPerl-Run. I can work on a new release for BioPerl-Run that address those
specific issues (as well as other missing dependencies I found), but
Bio-Graphics has some additional versioning problems with CPAN that ne
Hi Christopher,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:38:03PM +, Fields, Christopher J wrote:
> >bioperl-run (adding bioperl mailing list to CC) but can Debian patch
> >bioperl-run to include those files like upstream has done for the
> >next release?
> >
> >Carnë
> >
> >[1]
> >https://github.com/bioper
On 12/16/16, 5:11 AM, "Bioperl-l on behalf of Carnë Draug"
wrote:
>On 16 December 2016 at 10:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> when trying to run Bioperl-run unit tests while BioPerl 1.7.1 is
>> installed (on a Debian system with the current Debian package in
>> unstable) I get lots of er
Hello everybody, and thanks Carnë for the quick answer !
Le Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:06:35PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:38:02AM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
>
> > For example, there is now
> > bio-biblio, bio-eutilities, and bio-coordinates which were previously pa
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:08:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > bioperl-run (adding bioperl mailing list to CC) but can Debian patch
> > bioperl-run to include those files like upstream has done for the
> > next release?
>
> I'd prefer an official release but if there is no better chance we
> c
Hi Carnë,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:11:33AM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
>
> That module (Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase) is now part of bioperl-run [1].
> Unfortunately, it seems that there has been no new release of bioperl-run
> since that change.
Thanks for this valuable information.
> I am no
Hi Carnë,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:38:02AM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
> >> The cause is most probably that libbio-graphics-perl does not work
> >> together with bioperl 1.7.1 (see also #848105). I'm now becoming aware
> >> that with the naive upgrade to bioperl 1.7.1 we have triggered problems
>
The DebianMed team is planning to hold a Sprint meeting in Bucharest,
Romania from January 12th to January 16th, 2017..
This is the 7th sprint event of the team. More info will come on the wiki
page: https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2017/DebianMed2017
The goals of this sprint is to progress on med
On 16 December 2016 at 09:50, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:45:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Package: src:gbrowse
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: FTBFS
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when trying to build gbrowse it fails to build from source:
>>
>> ...
>> CGI::param called in lis
On 16 December 2016 at 10:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when trying to run Bioperl-run unit tests while BioPerl 1.7.1 is
> installed (on a Debian system with the current Debian package in
> unstable) I get lots of errors of type
>
>Can't locate Bio/Tools/Run/WrapperBase.pm in @INC (you ma
Package: src:filo
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to filo and join our advent calendar bug
squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (50
Package: src:poa
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to poa and join our advent calendar bug
squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
Package: src:picard-tools
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to picard-tools and join our advent calendar bug
squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-u
Package: src:proda
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to proda and join our advent calendar bug
squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'),
Package: src:prank
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to prank and join our advent calendar bug
squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500
Package: src:dialign-t
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to dialign-t and join our advent calendar bug
squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-update
Package: src:fsa
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
please add an autopkgtest to fsa and join the Debian Med advent calendar
bug squashing party by doing so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates
Package: src:mapdamage
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
Hi,
I'm filing a set of bugs for packages where an autopkgtest would make
some sense considering its importance due to the number of active users
(based on popcon values). Since adding tests should be a task for
newcomers the bugs will be ta
Hello,
Right, we need to get the DPL's approval, even though I never asked my
expenses to be covered ;o/ I can prepare for that together with
Michael. Please all just add your names on the Sprint page.
Something else that came to mind, which is that we should think about
lowering mental hurdles
Hi,
when trying to run Bioperl-run unit tests while BioPerl 1.7.1 is
installed (on a Debian system with the current Debian package in
unstable) I get lots of errors of type
Can't locate Bio/Tools/Run/WrapperBase.pm in @INC (you may need to install
the Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase module)
Wh
Hi,
this is a very *urgent* call to all BioPerl users to raise their
opinion. To verify what else might be broken by the new BioPerl I
tested its rdepends. I stumbled upon bioperl-run which is making
heavy use of
/usr/share/perl5/Bio/Tools/Run/WrapperBase.pm
which is also removed from late
22 matches
Mail list logo