Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:10:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > registry_prefix={ > "bio.tools"=>"https://bio.tools/";, This entry does not work with your algorithm: bowtie| bio.tools | http://bio.tools/tool/DebianMed/bowtie/1.1.1 I've removed this entry from debian/upstream/metad

Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:22:34AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:10:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > > registry_prefix={ > > "bio.tools"=>"https://bio.tools/";, > > "RRID" => "http://identifiers.org/rrid/RRID:";, > > "SciCrunch" => "http://identifiers.org/rr

Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-19 Thread Dylan Aïssi
Hi Andreas, 2017-10-19 8:29 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:10:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> "OMICtools" => "https://duckduckgo.com/?q=\\"; (a single backslash at the >> end is what I want) > > The link > > https://duckduckgo.com/?q=\OMIC_6 > > should lead

Re: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dylan, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:26:44PM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > 2017-10-19 8:29 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:10:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > >> "OMICtools" => "https://duckduckgo.com/?q=\\"; (a single backslash at the > >> end is what

Please check implementation (Was: Proposal for Registry-display on task pages)

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I've posted a set of questions today to this list and they are remaining **open**. So those who feel able to answer the questions please check out this thread. Despite the open questions I tried an example implementation: https://blends.debian.org/med/tasks/bio To mark different reposit

Re: debian/upstream/metadata: registry item for the Blends' task pages?

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dylan, On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:17:29AM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > > fully grasp how to get it in and - is not everything in > > upstream/metadata something for appstream? Also, from what I got, this > > shoud all be redistributed with the upstream source tree and not be kept > > within Debi

Re: debian/upstream/metadata: registry item for the Blends' task pages?

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:44:48AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > @Andreas, I am mostly concerned about getting the references to > registries as quickly as possible to our task pages. What do you > suggest? Continue for now with debian/upstream/metadata and move to > appstream as soon as we kno

[MoM] Re: gatb-core packaging

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Nadiya, after the longish explanation about your packaging attempt of gatb-core I wonder whether this former hint of Olivier might get some relevance to get things done more easily. May be you can discuss removing third party code with upstream authors. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, A

Help with cmake / Qt5 migration needed

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd like to package beads[1] which is Qt4 but since Qt4 will be droped soon my goal is to port it to Qt5. With my current packaging attempt[1] I get: CMake Error at src/CMakeLists.txt:4 (FIND_PACKAGE): Found package configuration file: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cma

Re: Fwd: Lack of license for pal2nal

2017-10-19 Thread Michael Crusoe
Hello Mikita, Thank you very much! Pe 17 oct. 2017 1:59 p.m., "Mikita Suyama" a scris: Hello Michael, I put a sentence about the license to the script, so from now on, the script (pal2nal.pl v14.1) is licensed under GPL v2.0. At the moment, I don't have an access permission to the download si

Re: [Outreachy] Hi all!

2017-10-19 Thread ka lou
Dear all, I am sorry for the late answer! This is just an update on my last tries to get the source of tophat and run a test with sbuild ;) As Diane suggested in the last email , i downloaded and installed (at least tried too) the sbuild package on my linux mint machine. I followed the instructi

Role of acedb-other-belvu and acedb-other-dotter versus belvu & dotter from seqtools

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I started to check the list of external packages of possibly interesting packages and stumbled upon blixem which is part of seqtools[1]. The source also contains dotter and belvu and seems to be actively maintained. However, the packages acedb-other-belvu and acedb-other-dotter from source a

RFS: bowtie/1.2.1.1+dfsg-1

2017-10-19 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Hello, I've worked a bit on bowtie in git [0] and think that it is ready for upload. It also presumably closes #864439. One of the issues I run during package building is that bowtie unit tests fail on example6 and exmaple9. Could somebody who uses bowtie please comment on this ? Not sure if this

Re: RFS: bowtie/1.2.1.1+dfsg-1

2017-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alex, thanks a lot for your work on this. I'd consider this quite important but I would prefer if someone more educated than I who knows what the test issues might mean would have another look. Please ping me again if nobody would step in (should there really nobody interested???) and I'll sp