Hi Yihui Xie,
I'm considering packaging rmarkdown for Debian since several just
packaged software would profit from it. For Debian uploads I need to
make sure that each file of the source is available and has a proper
license. When I inspected the code I stumbled upon ioslides. This
project has
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 07:37:29PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Consequently this triggers my next question: Would you mind if I
> convert avogadro to Git as I have done with garlic and ghemical?
Fine with me.
Michael
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:53:00PM +0100, chrysn wrote:
>
> The current master passes build in a cowbuilder that has access to
> python3-ratelimiter, and lintian's only serious complaints are the
> privacy violations (JavsScript and badges in the documentation and some
> web application templ
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:45:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Will let you know when I'm through with those and all is pushed to
> > alioth again.
The current master passes build in a cowbuilder that has access to
python3-ratelimiter, and lintian's only serious complaints are the
privacy viol
control: retitle -1 ITP: r-cran-rmarkdown -- GNU R tool to convert R Markdown
documents into a variety of formats
Hi,
I confirm that I retitled (now with correct spelling the bug to ITP and
pushed the preliminary packaging to
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/r-cran-rmarkdown.git
I
Hi Mattia,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:29:26PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:44:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Sorry for not beeing more verbose. This was the result of the patch
> > I've got when trying to build the package *including* the symbols. :-(
> > These
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:44:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sorry for not beeing more verbose. This was the result of the patch
> I've got when trying to build the package *including* the symbols. :-(
> These were marked as "# MISSING #".
>
> Feel free to try your luck without removing ...
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:23:21PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> Although, looking at
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/htslib.git/commit/?id=ca55c40f2a3154004d6e55eac4bdc2cdffa413b3
> I noticed that:
>
> 1) you happily removed symbols: why so? removing symbols is a ABI
> break, an
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:13:39PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> since we frequently observed issues with incompatibilities of samtools I
> uploaded the new version to experimental first. Strictly speaking we
> should check whether a transition is needed.
Of course a transition (given the definit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-rmarkdown
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : JJ Allaire, Yihui Xie et al
* URL : http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com,
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmarkdown/index.html
* License : GPL-3
Hi folks,
since we frequently observed issues with incompatibilities of samtools I
uploaded the new version to experimental first. Strictly speaking we
should check whether a transition is needed. Are there any known issues
with incompatibilities of packages listed when you do
apt-cache rde
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:35:53PM +0100, chrysn wrote:
> I've got them all down locally; it'll need some cleaning up (and
> possibly upstreaming) of patches, and I have yet to run it in a pbuilder
> to see which build dependencies popped up that are undeclared so far,
> but I don't expect any show
> The problem is that when trying to build this I get a lot of errors in
> the build time tests. Is there any volunteer to have a look?
I've got them all down locally; it'll need some cleaning up (and
possibly upstreaming) of patches, and I have yet to run it in a pbuilder
to see which build depe
13 matches
Mail list logo
