Le Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 03:52:08PM +0100, Tony Travis a écrit :
>
> I use Debian-Med packages every day for my scientific work and I really
> appreciate the hard work that the Debian-Med team have done to make this
> software available via the Debian Sid repositories that Ubuntu is based
> on, but
On 15/06/18 13:58, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit :
>>
>> I just updated cnvkit locally and found Michael's patch "Remove .py
>> extensions as per Debian policy". I personally came to the conclusion
>> that differences to upstream in the nam
Le Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit :
>
> I just updated cnvkit locally and found Michael's patch "Remove .py
> extensions as per Debian policy". I personally came to the conclusion
> that differences to upstream in the naming of binaries is detrimental
> for the accep
Hello,
I just updated cnvkit locally and found Michael's patch "Remove .py
extensions as per Debian policy". I personally came to the conclusion
that differences to upstream in the naming of binaries is detrimental
for the acceptance of our distribution in the scientific community.
Just, nobody wa
Hi Afif, Hi Andreas,
I faced a problem while building kmer package and after that trying to test
it with autopkgtest.
Initially, I built kmer in a sbuild chroot environment and run autopkgtest:
it failed.
After that, I run autopkgtest so that it built the package itself from the
local source prov
5 matches
Mail list logo
