Re: OMICtools of any use?

Hi Carnë, On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:49:36PM +, Carnë Draug wrote: > I was trying to check some of the OMICS ids in debian-med packages but > seems that one can no longer access the information on their site > without an account. Example, its page for imagej > > https://omictools.com/ima

Re: Re: bart: version 0.4.04

> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28:44PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional > > > information and tell me what you want me to sponsor. > >  > > Then let's keep it like

DebianMed sprint organization

Hi, I tried to get reimbursment approval from DPL for sprint organization. There is no specific issue but DPL expects quite exact funding request, meaning each DD expected expenses. I proposed an average cost for approval but DPL really wants a global budget matching real needs of each DD. If y

OMICtools of any use?

Hi I was trying to check some of the OMICS ids in debian-med packages but seems that one can no longer access the information on their site without an account. Example, its page for imagej https://omictools.com/imagej-tool Just leads to a page forcing me to subscribe or sign in. Since the

Status of nanocall

Hi, by chance I stumbled upon nanocall[1] which does not build unfortunately: cd /build/nanocall-0.7.4/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/nanocall && /usr/bin/c++ -I/build/nanocall-0.7.4/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu -I/build/nanocall-0.7.4/src/builtin_models -I/build/nanocall-0.7.4/src/tclap/include -I/build/nan

Re: bart: version 0.4.04

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28:44PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional > > information and tell me what you want me to sponsor. > > Then let's keep it like it is and if

Re: bart: version 0.4.04

>On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > >  > > I have another question: Would it be ok to use a dependency > > on debhelper (>=10) instead of (>=11~) ? Then the package > > could be build on stable without changes. > > There is no strict reason to enforce debhelper 11 - I

DebianMed sprint 9-11/03/2019 in Vilnius Lithuania

Hi, DebianMed [0] will organize its annual sprint from 9 to 11 march 2019. Feel free to join us for this event for packaging, bug squashing or key signing. More info is available at https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/2019/DebianMed2019 [1] [0] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed [1] https://wiki.debia

Re: December

Hi, thanks a lot Thorsten for your yearly Advent calendar. Its quite a motivation to tackle also older bugs. I tried hard to close one bug per day (but did not managed on 9.+10. due to real life tasks). I would have loved if other members of the team would have taken over. ;-) Everybody please