Re: RoSA needs sambamba for testing which needs a patch to htslib to build

Am Sa., 4. Juli 2020 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Andreas Tille : > > Hi Steffen, > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 12:53:00PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948919 > > > > please allow that I bring some attention to this bug report. Are there > > any objection

Re: RFS: vienna-rna

Hi Steffen, On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:50:57PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > Admittedly, I consider fixing the man pages something that upstream has > to address - yes, we can help, but ... nothing that should stop us from > uploading, especially since it is coming with an "acadmics-only" > no

Re: RFS Fwd: Bug#964345: Acknowledgement (ITP: nanoplot -- plotting scripts for long read sequencing data)

On 06.07.20 09:47, Andreas Tille wrote: Control: blocked -1 by 959381 Hi Steffen, On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 10:39:01PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: This package of yours was waiting for an ITP but was otherwise mostly fine. Upstream had a new version in the meantime that eliminated the patch,

RFS: vienna-rna

Hello, I had revisited the vienna-rna package this afternoon. It is now free of lintian-errors, has some warnings, still: $ lintian ../vienna-rna_2.4.14+dfsg-1_amd64.changes W: python3-rna-dbgsym: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbolsusr/lib/debug/.build-id/25/63e00c717f1fc07c62438558b902301f253abf.d

Re: RoSA needs sambamba for testing which needs a patch to htslib to build

On 4 Jul 2020, at 16:13, Andreas Tille mailto:andr...@an3as.eu>> wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 12:53:00PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: please allow that I bring some attention to this bug report. Are there any objections to adopt the patch in guix to htslib also for Debian? This just removes the

[RFS] mptp

Hi, I've added autopkgtests for mptp - builds with passing tests. I've pushed my changes to the team-repo[1] Please: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/mptp OR Grant DM access: PGP key fingerprint: 3E99A526F5DCC0CBBF1CEEA600BAE74B343369F1 Thanks and regards Nilesh

Re: RFS: edtsurf

On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:01:07PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote: > Hi, > While adding autopkgtests to EDTSurf, I noticed that it returns 1 on > successful execution, which breaks autopkgtests. > So along with the autopkgtests, I've added a patch to fix this. It seems > safe to make this change pure

Re: RFS Fwd: Bug#964345: Acknowledgement (ITP: nanoplot -- plotting scripts for long read sequencing data)

Control: blocked -1 by 959381 Hi Steffen, On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 10:39:01PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > This package of yours was waiting for an ITP but was otherwise mostly > fine. Upstream had a new version in the meantime that eliminated the > patch, but I then added another one  :o) > >

RFS: edtsurf

Hi, While adding autopkgtests to EDTSurf, I noticed that it returns 1 on successful execution, which breaks autopkgtests. So along with the autopkgtests, I've added a patch to fix this. It seems safe to make this change purely by looking at the code and I can't find any documentation anywhere. Ple