Re: Thanks a lot for enabling igv in main [Was: igv_2.6.3+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable]

2021-11-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Pierre, Am Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 06:02:39PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > > thanks a lot for all your work on this. > > You are welcome! Indeed I am very pleased this long-term target of mine is > now reached! Its nice to reach long term goals! > > I intended to do a source-only upload and wh

Re: Thanks a lot for enabling igv in main [Was: igv_2.6.3+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable]

2021-11-09 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 09/11/2021 à 07:55, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi Pierre, thanks a lot for all your work on this. You are welcome! Indeed I am very pleased this long-term target of mine is now reached! I intended to do a source-only upload and when doing so at least fixing the watch file (I re

Re: libpdb-redo

2021-11-09 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Maarten, > > On 2021-11-08 14:39, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > > Yes, the new libcifpp is required. But mainly because I've switched to > > cmake entirely for building software, and the cmake file of libpdb-redo > > requires the

Re: libpdb-redo

2021-11-09 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Maarten, On 2021-11-08 14:39, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > Yes, the new libcifpp is required. But mainly because I've switched to > cmake entirely for building software, and the cmake file of libpdb-redo > requires the  cmake config files from libcifpp. > > I could build and test the package