Re: New version of muscle with changed options compared to previous versions [muscle_5.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable]

Hi, Am Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 05:45:49PM +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys: > I consider myself a muscle user, albeit mostly for teaching. Integration > with biopython is quite important aspect to me as well. > > Although stability is a desired quality, algorithm improvement is > probably more important

Re: New version of muscle with changed options compared to previous versions [muscle_5.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable]

Hi, On 2022-01-17 16:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > I've just realised there is a new version of muscle (now on Github) > which has not only a changed algorithm but also changed command line > options (I had to adapt autopkgtest which is also a bit weak - some > educated person should check the result

Re: Any idea how to deal with multiple definitions in new version of genometester?

Andreas Tille writes: > Hi Aaron, > > Am Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 09:32:08PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: >> >> It looks like this code base still goes by an old non-standard notion of >> the semantics of "inline" with vs. without "extern" in C [1]. Please >> try building with -fgnu89-inline or cha

New version of muscle with changed options compared to previous versions [muscle_5.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable]

Hi, I've just realised there is a new version of muscle (now on Github) which has not only a changed algorithm but also changed command line options (I had to adapt autopkgtest which is also a bit weak - some educated person should check the result and drop a proper md5sum for the expected result)

Re: Updating camitk

Dear Emmanuel, thanks a lot for your quick response. Am Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 01:57:05PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon: > Dear Andreas > > Thank you very much for looking into that. It's true that the current > supported version of ITK is 4.12 or 4.13, but I was under the illusion that > it sho

Updating camitk

Hi Emmanuel, I tried to upgrade camitk to its latest upstream version in Git[1]. I somehow lived under the impression that insighttoolkit5 is needed but it seems some checks are proving me wrong. In any case I was running into a build time failure and it would be great if you could have a look.

Re: [Help] Autopkgtest of idseq-bench

On 1/17/22 2:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, my time to upgrade packages today is running out. I assumed that the autopkgtest of idseq-bench might need internet-access which I enabled but it seems there is some other issue[1] Looking at it, it looks like it is stemming from insilicoseq's /usr