qiime ->Fwd: Bug#1014692 closed by Thorsten Alteholz (manually closing bug)

2022-08-29 Thread Steffen Moeller
Thorsten is right - the qiime package should be arch-independent. But how do we then get it to migrate to testing? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qiime Upstream does not want to have 32bit installations, so they introduced a hardware-dependency: AssertionError: dtype('int64') != which then sh

Re: qiime ->Fwd: Bug#1014692 closed by Thorsten Alteholz (manually closing bug)

2022-08-29 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 01:21:43PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > Thorsten is right - the qiime package should be arch-independent. But > how do we then get it to migrate to testing? > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qiime > > Upstream does not want to have 32bit installations, so they introduc

Re: qiime ->Fwd: Bug#1014692 closed by Thorsten Alteholz (manually closing bug)

2022-08-29 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:15:04PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 01:21:43PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > > Thorsten is right - the qiime package should be arch-independent. But > > how do we then get it to migrate to testing? > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qiime >

Re: RFS -- autopkgtest for python-wdlparse

2022-08-29 Thread Mohd Bilal
On 8/28/22 23:14, Nilesh Patra wrote: Rather than printing the ast, it'd be better to `assert' it equal to expected output. Please make this change before you upload. It'd be even better if you can play around with the ast dump and compare relevant parts. I have made the changes as suggeste

RFS -- autopkgtest for libbigwig

2022-08-29 Thread Mohd Bilal
Hello team, I've added autopkgtest for libbigwig[1] and also fixed the blhc failure. Requesting a review and sponsor for my changes. [1] - https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libbigwig Thanks -- ╭───╮ │ Mohammed Bilal

Re: RFS -- autopkgtest for python-wdlparse

2022-08-29 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 11:18:07PM +0530, Mohd Bilal wrote: > On 8/28/22 23:14, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Rather than printing the ast, it'd be better to `assert' it equal to > > expected output. > > Please make this change before you upload. > > > > It'd be even better if you can play around with

An invitation to visit Fitbit Community

2022-08-29 Thread agwgwg
agwgwg (qvg993...@foxmail.com) at Fitbit Community thinks this is fascinating, helpful, interesting, useful, infuriating, thought-provoking, or just downright cool. We hope you will visit Fitbit Community and check it out for yourself. https://community.fitbit.com/t5/Windows-10-App/I-can-t-see-