"Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
> u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
>
>> Ah, right, sra-sdk will need to go through NEW too -- the ngs-sdk code
>> it absorbed underwent an SONAME bump along the way. (All necessary
>> ncbi-vdb changes passed NEW a few weeks ago, but ncbi-vdb 3.x is sitting
>> in ex
u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> Ah, right, sra-sdk will need to go through NEW too -- the ngs-sdk code
> it absorbed underwent an SONAME bump along the way. (All necessary
> ncbi-vdb changes passed NEW a few weeks ago, but ncbi-vdb 3.x is sitting
> in experimental until sra-sdk joins it
Am Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:15:59AM +0200 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
>
> Formally, yes. But upstream just got a nobel price for their work - that
> work. We should not remove this now but in contrary work with upstream
> to think of some way to nicely archive their work with us and maybe they
> could
Am 10.10.2022 um 10:04 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
On 10 October 2022 11:50:14 am IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
If no one gets to it, asking for removal is a sensible option. It otherwise
imho becomes another time sapping package that no one cares about much.
There was no volunteer to pick up the gc
On 10 October 2022 11:50:14 am IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> If no one gets to it, asking for removal is a sensible option. It otherwise
>> imho becomes another time sapping package that no one cares about much.
>
>There was no volunteer to pick up the gcc-12 port of this package. So
>it seems
5 matches
Mail list logo