Re: Attempt to upgrade sra-sdk

2023-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, Am Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 06:30:01PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > > Because env/common.cmake doesn't actually try to use a system > installation: > > #check_include_file_cxx(mbedtls/md.h HAVE_MBEDTLS_H) > set(HAVE_MBEDTLS_H 0) # TODO: disabling system mbedtls since it may be >

Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2023-12-10 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10.12.23 14:06, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition reasonably soon. Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required for Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be done first? These are

Re: bart version 0.9.00

2023-12-10 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Martin Uecker wrote: > I upgraded the BART package to the new upstream release. > > I would appreciate if someone could take a look and then > upload it Hi Martin, The new package version looks good to me. I finalized the debian/changelog, uploaded,

bart version 0.9.00

2023-12-10 Thread Martin Uecker
Hi, I upgraded the BART package to the new upstream release. I would appreciate if someone could take a look and then upload it Thanks! Martin

Re: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1?

2023-12-10 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2023-12-10 21:55, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote: Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great and small! 3.) The following one-liner suggests 44 debian packages might be affected by the breaks Rebecca said would be caused by pandas 2.x: $ for s in augur

Re: Attempt to upgrade sra-sdk

2023-12-10 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > No mbedtls libs found installed in the system, using local copy... Because env/common.cmake doesn't actually try to use a system installation: #check_include_file_cxx(mbedtls/md.h HAVE_MBEDTLS_H) set(HAVE_MBEDTLS_H 0) # TODO: disabling system mbedtls since it may be

pandas 1.5 -> 2.1?

2023-12-10 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great and small! I like your correspondence about upgrading from version 1.5 of pandas to 2.1. It's open, scientific and explores the ideal of proceeding wisely in a matter of public interest. My humble thoughts are: 1.)

Re: Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2023-12-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition reasonably > soon. > > Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required for > Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2023-12-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition reasonably soon. Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required for Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be done first? These are broken by pandas 2.x and have a possible (but

Re: Attempt to upgrade sra-sdk

2023-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron, Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 08:23:26PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > > AFAICT, the immediate problem is that label_online_tests.patch refers to > at least one removed or renamed test: > > CMake Error at test/internal/vdb-diff/CMakeLists.txt:42 > (set_tests_properties): >