Hi Aaron,
Am Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 06:30:01PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
>
> Because env/common.cmake doesn't actually try to use a system
> installation:
>
> #check_include_file_cxx(mbedtls/md.h HAVE_MBEDTLS_H)
> set(HAVE_MBEDTLS_H 0) # TODO: disabling system mbedtls since it may be
>
On 10.12.23 14:06, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition
reasonably soon.
Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required
for Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be
done first?
These are
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Martin Uecker wrote:
> I upgraded the BART package to the new upstream release.
>
> I would appreciate if someone could take a look and then
> upload it
Hi Martin,
The new package version looks good to me. I finalized the
debian/changelog, uploaded,
Hi,
I upgraded the BART package to the new upstream release.
I would appreciate if someone could take a look and then
upload it
Thanks!
Martin
On 2023-12-10 21:55, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great
and small!
3.) The following one-liner suggests 44 debian
packages might be affected by the breaks
Rebecca said would be caused by pandas 2.x:
$ for s in augur
Andreas Tille writes:
> No mbedtls libs found installed in the system, using local copy...
Because env/common.cmake doesn't actually try to use a system
installation:
#check_include_file_cxx(mbedtls/md.h HAVE_MBEDTLS_H)
set(HAVE_MBEDTLS_H 0) # TODO: disabling system mbedtls since it may be
Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great and
small!
I like your correspondence about upgrading from
version 1.5 of pandas to 2.1.
It's open, scientific and explores the ideal of
proceeding wisely in a matter of public interest.
My humble thoughts are:
1.)
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition reasonably
> soon.
>
> Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required for
> Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to
I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition
reasonably soon.
Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required
for Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be
done first?
These are broken by pandas 2.x and have a possible (but
Hi Aaron,
Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 08:23:26PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
>
> AFAICT, the immediate problem is that label_online_tests.patch refers to
> at least one removed or renamed test:
>
> CMake Error at test/internal/vdb-diff/CMakeLists.txt:42
> (set_tests_properties):
>
10 matches
Mail list logo