Re: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

2012-01-16 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 15.01.2012 08:54, schrieb Andreas Tille: > any hint, how to fix this problem? Well, in your first answer to the bug report you wrote: > Could you give any hint because it is a bit hard to > reproduce if you are sitting on a Linux box. Any help is welcome. Luckily you don't have to! Th

Re: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

2012-01-16 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 16.01.2012 18:09, schrieb Andreas Tille: >> ... and voila! You can indeed fix (or at least investigate further) >> these bugs while sitting before a Linux box. > Well, what your are summerizing with a "voila" is quite a bit of work [..] Well, actually it is: 1) Looking up a server name 2

Re: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

2012-01-17 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 16.01.2012 19:18, schrieb Andreas Tille: > Why not enabling others having the experience to have > fixed a bug on freebsd? The package is team maintained. To cite you in the mail which started this thread: > any hint, how to fix this problem? And the previous mail you claimed you can't

Re: Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

2012-01-24 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Philipp Kern [120120 15:41]: > > In case the version in Squeeze would be considered free also all > > other versions are free (which would be *really* good news). So > > please, please prove me wrong in my opinion that this database is > > not distributable. I'm specifically concerned ab