On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 06:01:44PM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >
> > The fis-gtm package was in the backlog while I was teaching a class
> > on VistA at SUNY Albany this Spring.
> >
> > I c
Steve, Andreas,
Is help still needed on this issue ?
> http://bugs.debian.org/746863
I see that the severity has been now set to normal, on Friday June 6th,
and apparently this allows the package to continue its way to testing.
Please let me know if we can be of any help.
Thanks
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> any news about fis-gtm update?
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> --
Hi Andreas,
The fis-gtm package was in the backlog while I was teaching a class
on VistA at SUNY Albany this Sprin
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On June 5, 2014 07:15:33 PM costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is somebody taking care of 746863?
> > http://bugs.debian.org/746863
>
> I am not actively working on it. In truth, I have very limited time
> available
+1 for Matt's suggestion of setting up a Nightly build
submitting to the ITK dashboard.
That's a great way to ensure that we follow up on the issue.
We will be happy to help get ITK available in more
architectures in Debian.
Thanks a lot for your hard work on packaging ITK !
Luis
A token of appreciation for you all packagers:
http://opensource.com/business/14/2/thank-a-linux-packager-today
and in particular,
thanks to Andreas for putting together the MoM program.
Regards,
Luis
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> There is no big difference to all the other packages in Debian.
> Transitions happen all the time.
>
> Just let the latest stable release propagate into testing. Luis is setting
> up the git packaging infrastructure to make a transitio
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> ... provided that ftpmaster accept this plan.
Yes, point taken.
> >- The hard links are required, so we will add lintian
> > exceptions for them.
>
> I admit that I did not really get it why they are "req
Thanks all for the discussion on how to proceed
with the fis-gtm update.
Allow me to offer a summary below, and please
correct me if I missed anything, or misunderstood
any of the points.
1) We agree to package multiple versions of fis-gtm.
The exact number is still in the air, but it look
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> It comes down to a simple question:
>
> Which fis-gtm version is most useful in the next Debian release?
>
> I think the best way is to release one stable fis-gtm package. Right now I
> see 272 warnings and 1 error related to the c
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Following the policy for Git-based packaging, we should be able
> > to host both versions 6.0 and 6.1 side by side without conflict.
>
> Yes. But we probably need to find out how to work with branches in
> git-buildpackage.
Yes, that's
Andreas,
Given that upstream GT.M recently released its version 6.1:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fis-gtm/files/GT.M-x86-Linux-src/V6.1-000/
It sound like a good idea to update the Debian package for it.
Current fis-gtm package is version 6.0-003.
Following the policy for Git-based packagi
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > In addition you could file a bug to pristine-tar maintainers to use
> > xdelta3 instead of xdelta to avoid the problem you reported in
> > #.
> >
>
> I think I'll manage this before I need to leave here.
>
>
Ok,
I'll wait to hear from yo
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Did you noticed
>
> $ LANG=C apt-cache search xdelta | grep ^x
> xdelta - A diff utility which works with binary files
> xdelta3 - Diff utility which works with binary files
>
> ... so probably there would have been a shortcut from installing
Update report:
===
Downloaded xdelta3 source code from:
https://code.google.com/p/xdelta/downloads/detail?name=xdelta3-3.0.8.tar.xz&can=2&q=
and build it locally with
unxz xdelta3-3.0.8.tar.xz
tar xf xdelta3-3.0.8.tar
cd xdelta3-3.0.8/
./configure --prefix=/home/ibanez/local
mkdir ~/
Update on the exploration:
=
I have been down to the Dark Forest of Perl, and back...:-)
After trying many combinations of
git-import-orig --pristine-tar
git-buildpackage--pristine-tar
Decided to go down to the source code of git-pac
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 09:46:40AM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > $ TMPDIR=/var/tmp git import-orig --pristine-tar
> > ../../Replication/vista-foia_0.20130405.orig.tar.gz
> >
> > What is
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> I have done some `git checkout pristine-tar` in several cases in
> repositories and found pretty small files since it only cares for
> metadata not for actual content files. So these files should definitely
> not be large.
>
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> > xdelta: warning: no matches found in from file, patch will apply
>> without it
>> >
>> > error: excessively large binary delta for
>&g
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > xdelta: warning: no matches found in from file, patch will apply without
> it
> >
> > error: excessively large binary delta for
> > /tmp/pristine-tar.ETnVfcsL8q/origtarball
> >
> > (Please consider filing a bug report.)
> >
> > pristine-tar
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Since you mentioned that you are creating the tarball anyway I hope you
> > considered xz or bz2 compression in favour of gz.
> >
> > > For me, git-buildpackage goes ahead and creates
> > > the tar.gz files from the content of the
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Luis
>
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 02:00:28PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > A bit more progress:
> >
> >
> > The upstream branch has now been tagged,
> > and pushed to the Git repository
A bit more progress:
The upstream branch has now been tagged,
and pushed to the Git repository in Alioth.
The following works now at least for me... :-)
for replicating the build in a fresh directory:
git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/vista-foia.git
cd vista-foia/
Andreas,
Here is the second attempt. :-)
New Git Repository
After reading more carefully the instructions in:
https://honk.sigxcpu.org/piki/development/debian_packages_in_git/
https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit
I have restructure
Andreas
Thanks for taking the time to look at the vista-foia package.
I realize that getting that couple gigabyte downloads
through an airport WLAN is not much fun.:-)
Your comments are very helpful.
Let me go back and read more about the git-buildpackage
command, and in general about
Good News:
We have made good progress in the vista-foia package,
and it seems to be ready for a first review by experienced
Debian developers.
Apologies in advance for the length of this email.
We are hoping that by making it a thorough description of
the package, we will
Blog post at opensource.com:
http://opensource.com/business/14/1/open-source-community-manager-appreciation
With a section kindly contributed by Andreas Tille.
Thanks to Andreas, and to all community managers,
for the hard work they do on keeping our free and open
source communities going.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:39:54PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > I have ran into Luis's recent blog post
> > http://www.osehra.org/blog/backporting-fis-gtm-ubuntu-linux-distribution
> >
> > Environment Set Up
> > Set
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
>
> nothing to be done ;) fis-gtm backports now uploaded for Debian wheezy
> and Ubuntu >= 12.04 to NeuroDebian repository. portal's website should
> pick it up within a day upon regeneration and fis-gtm will get its
> own page overview
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> >Thank You All !:-)
> >BTW,
> >we are now making progress
> >on the "vista-foia" package.
> > Luis
>
&
Thank You All !:-)
BTW,
we are now making progress
on the "vista-foia" package.
Luis
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> For a very nice post
> http://www.osehra.org/blog/packaging-fis-gtm-debian-linux-distribution-0
>
> ;-)
>
> --
> Yaroslav O. Ha
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
> Luis --
>
> It might be helpful if you looked at one of my VistA SemiVivA packages
> (for an example, go to
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/worldvista-ehr/files/WorldVistA%20EHR%20_VOE%201.0/WorldVistA%20EHR%20_VOE%201.0%20Release%206-2008
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:47:33PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > 3) Added the "debian" subdirectory with the initial
> > sketch of what was done in
> >
> >
> > https:/
he initial
sketch of what was done in
https://github.com/luisibanez/debian-med-vista
I will now continue the packaging process by working
exclusively on the vista git repository in Alioth.
Regards,
Luis
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 06:41:47PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > Yes ! now on to VistA.
> >
> > https://github.com/luisibanez/debian-med-vista
>
> If this is Debian packaging related it might m
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > finally we have a nice Christmas gift for all people dealing with VistA:
> > fis-gtm is now accepted in unstable.
> > >...<
> > Thanks to everybody who has helped to let fis-gtm packages be
;
> Regards
> -- Bhaskar
>
>
> On 12/15/2013 04:04 PM (US Eastern Time), Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> This is great news !!
>
> Many thanks for all your hard work on making this happen !
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Amul Shah wrote:
&g
This is great news !!
Many thanks for all your hard work on making this happen !
Luis
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Amul Shah wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> > On Dec 15, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > finally we have a nice Christmas gift for all people dealing with
Regarding ITK4,
Being close to the ITK development team,
I will be happy to help with the process of transitioning to ITK4.
If anything needs to be coordinated with ITK upstream, we will be glad to
collaborate.
Best
Luis
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Promayon <
emmanue
as the only option I have seen to push things
> reasonably forward.
>
> I hope this is in you interest.
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:53:05AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > Hi Amul,
> >
> >
> > Just to second Andre
Hi Amul,
Just to second Andreas,
Please note that we at Kitware will be happy
to help move the package forward.
For example, if a Hackathon can help,
we will be glad to put one together.
Best,
Luis
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Amul,
>
> ca
Hi Amul,
FWIW:
The command
$ git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/fis-gtm.git fis-gtm
seems to be working fine for me.
I get:
Cloning into 'fis-gtm'...
The authenticity of host 'git.debian.org (217.196.43.140)' can't be
established.
RSA key fingerprint is 8c:c0:b8:9f:0a:79:ee:1
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> That's really great news! I hope Luis did not forget that we try to
> support your attempt as best as we can.
>
Definitely have not forgotten all the help... :-)
...and how useful the MoM program was
to make this possible.
Chee
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > We will be doing this with the new release of fis-gtm
> > which is now version 6.0-000:
> >
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fis-gtm/files/GT.M-x86-Linux-src/V6.0-000/
>
>
> Could you confirm that upstream FIS GT.M adopte
Just a quick note to share the good news that we are
regrouping to resume and finish the packaging of fis-gtm.
In the following days we will be working with the team that
participated in the Summer ( fis-gtm / Debian ) hackathon:
* Amul Shah
* Yaroslav Halchenko
* Brad King
* K.S. Bhaskar
We wil
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Regarding the OpenEMR upgrade mechanism [3], OpenEMR also has a
> > database upgrade script (there are actually two, one to deal with
> > database upgrades and the other to deal with upgrading the access
> > controls). The current OpenEMR
Andreas,
In some circles the differentiation is made as:
A) "Biomedical imaging": Microscopy size...
B) "Medical Imaging": Human size CTs, MRs, ultrasound
These categories are not perfect, since some applications
are in the border, but at least it provides an initial separation.
The user ba
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > BTW, we recently had some discussion that three-letter packages /
> > binaries could quite easily lead to name space conflicts. I do not
> > see an actual problem but I'm just mentioning this.
>
> may i suggest vista-client-ewd ?
>
>
We
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to
> your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as well
> (so I will not repeat these here).
>
> > /var/lib/vista/
> > /var/lib/vista/r
> > /var/lib
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
>
> On 07/10/2012 01:05 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
>> Regarding creating a vista user and group:
>>
>> I don't think it matters at all whether it is overkill or not.
>>
>> The only thing that matters is whether we've got a clear use case
>> f
Thanks Yaroslav,
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >Should I first report a bug entry for the package ?
> >[2]http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
>
> >or should I add the files to th
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:54:14AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > ...
> > Once EWD is available, we will have a very nifty
> > environment for developers to work on applications
> > that combine a Web based f
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Bhaskar, K.S wrote:
> Although GT.M is very flexible when it comes to configuration - it is all
> managed with environment variables - configuring directories one way vs.
> another can make it easier or harder to manage configurations. Two points
> worth noting a
Hi Andreas,
Following on the topic of how to make VistA easily
available to new developers, we mentioned earlier
that it will be really helpful to now package EWD.
EWD is a system that provides a Web development
environment that talks to a MUMPS backend.
http://gradvs1.mgateway.com/main/
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > To indicate that the content of the Git repository is the
> > VistA-FOIA release of "December 6th 2012".
>
> May I borrow your time traveling device? ;-)
>> I've lost mine somewhere in the
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > We still have to track the permission issues in the utf8
> > directory when building with cowbuilder...
>
>
> BTW, I have some news about this issue: I do *not* think that there is
> a difference between debuild a
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> It is using the very same mechanism as it was used in GNUmed (and is
> probably overkill also here - but anyway ... its there). You find the
> relevant pieces of code in the following files:
>
>arb-common.config
>arb-
One update more:
1) We worked today with Brad King and Amul Shah, and
solved the last pending issue with the packaging of
fis-gtm when using debuild. The package generated
by debuild now installs and behaves as expected.
We still have to track the permission issues in the u
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> OK, good. So this is pretty much like GNUmed which
> "consists" of 3 packages
>
> apt-get install postgresql
> apt-get install gnumed-server
> apt-get install gnumed-client
>
>
Excellent,
that's good to hear.
BTW:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:47:13PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > > In practice, the most used client for VistA is called
> > > CPRS, which is a separate but closely related project
> > > that provides a GUI, built on Delphi, and only work
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:08:32AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> > B) Added a "vista.install" file, that lists the files to be included
> > in the .deb package. Works great so far. The resulting
> >
Hi Andreas,
Here is a status update:
A) The version number is now "2012", which is much better
than my poor previous choice of the arbitrary "1.0".
B) Added a "vista.install" file, that lists the files to be included
in the .deb package. Works great so far. The resulting
.
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> BTw, I tweaked get-orig-source to use xz compression which saves 150MB.
>
>
Nice !
> >
> > Currently VistA is organized into Packages (at least at the file
> > representation level). There are about 125 Packages.
>
> I have no idea about
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
With such a size it is worth looking if major part of this is some non
> volatile (rarely changing) data which might be packaged separately and just
> Depend:ed upon
> It would be sad if each update would need 1 gb download
> --
>
Yes, t
Hi Andreas,
Here is an update on the status of packaging VistA.
Short version :
It is almost done !:-)
Long version:
0) First needs to install the fis-gtm package.
1) get-orig-source is doing:
Getting two tar files:
- One with the source code and data
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I tried to consolidate the vista entry in the tasks file[1] and your
> packaging files. The first thing I noticed that we have two ITPs: One
> for Vista[2] and one for World-Vista[3]. Could you clarify the differen
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> Great news is that Yaroslav's finding of dh_fixperms
> seems to be the solution to the struggle we were
> having with the setuid !:-)
>
An Update on this front:
Overriding dh_fixperms is working great
for
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [Quoting you in public because nothing was private in your mail]
>
The more Brains and Eyes the better ! :-)
Hi Luis,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:49:41PM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
&g
Amul,
Thanks for making the changes in the Git repository.
In order to match that new version:
1) I modified changlog to pull : 57f2d896697
2) Removed the insertion of shebang lines from the "rules" file.
3) Removed the incorrect setuid attempt from the "rules" file.
4) Inserted an override_dh_
Hi Yaroslav,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Luis, I have inlined my answers ... I do not have a "working" checkout
> of fis-gtm since there was some restructuring you guys were talking
> about -- please commit them.
>
>
mm, It should be building with what is curren
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> It turned out to be easier to remove the COPYING file
>> as a final step in the installation:
>>
>> override_dh_auto_install:
>> @echo "I: F
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > --installdir $(CURDIR)/debian/$(BINPKG)/usr/$(GTM_INSTALL_DIR)
> > @echo "I: Fixing up permissions for removed write rights -- we aren't
> > done yet!"
> > chmod +w -R $(CURDIR)/debian/$(BINPKG)/usr/$(GTM_INSTALL_DIR)
> > + chmod u+s
It turned out to be easier to remove the COPYING file
as a final step in the installation:
override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install --destdir=debian/$(BINPKG)-stage1 $@
cd debian/$(BINPKG)-stage1/usr/$(GTM_INSTALL_DIR) && \
gtm_destdir=$(CURDIR)/debian/$(BINPKG) \
./gtminstall --utf8 default --us
Just for the record,
A) linitian exceptions were added in the file:
debian/source/lintian-overrides
with content:
#
# Overriding warning for the COPYING file.
# We are aware that there is another license file.
# This will be addressed upstream at some point.
#
fis-gtm-5.5.000 [am
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > W: fis-gtm source: newer-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.1)
>
> That's because of your squeeze VM. You should probably install lintian
> from unstable using
>
>apt-get -t unstable install lintian
>
> (after having added unsta
ight permissions, or maybe
from knowing that it has to modify the permissions
I'm trying to track that...
Luis
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Thanks Luis,
>
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >In s
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please note that I reorganised SVN a bit to get rid of previous
> packaging attempts which are now obsolete since we are profiting from
> new build system.
Noted !
Thanks for reorganizing the files.
>
>
> The cowbui
Hi Yaroslav,
--
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> Great to hear that we are almost there. Next step actually would be to
> make sure it builds "correct" binary packages in a clean
> environment (e.g. using pbuilder or cowbuilder). Last ti
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So please let me rephrase what needs to be done:
>
> 1. Check out orig source using
> make -f debian/rules get-orig-source
>
Yes.
This will bring you the sources from the github repository.
(I presume that at some poin
the threeen1f.m.
So, let me go through Yaroslav's list:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
>> otherwise -- I am waiting from you to say "it seems that everything is
>> cool with cmakification, and produced/installed binaries work as
>&
Got it,
I'll run a review of the state tomorrow (Thursday)
and report back, following the items in your check
list below.
Thanks
Luis
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> I am trying to keep my
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> so I committed and testing now
>
> wow -- we even crossed with commits progressing the revision... I took
> yours since you committed first, although it is a bit 'incorrect':
>
> -fis-gtm (5.5-000+git100-g949806c-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Amul Shah wrote:
> > Yaroslav,
> > I assume that you will take care of setting LC_ALL in the debian package
> build, correct?
>
> yeah -- I will... but today I might just collapse and tomorrow evening I
> have some
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for jumping in.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> The fis-gtm package is actually really important and I would be happy to
> jump in but I somehow lost track in all these discussions. Could somebody
> please confirm that a simple
>
>uscan --force-
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> > + ah right -- test/fix packaging on 32bit system ;)
>
>
FWIW,
We are mostly working on 32bits in a Debian VM.
Most of our reports are from what we are doing in 32bits.
Luis
Status Update:
1) The execution permissions problem has been solved.
(it was due to a problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH
and fakeroot). Brad fixed it here:
https://github.com/luisibanez/fis-gtm/commit/8dde79ed64efebc53e4ac2dbd6c4ed0c394e5286
2) The installed files now do not have any inte
Here is the status of what we have
done with Brad this afternoon.
1) The package for fis-gtm is now building and installing
correctly by using the following git HEAD
https://github.com/luisibanez/fis-gtm/commit/74aa25e0751a28a08202a13f9f13c79e532c29ab
the Debian-med SVN revision 11396.
Yaroslav,
Thanks for configuring the Debian files to take
advantage of Brad's recent modifications.
I'm trying to replicate the process and run in the following message:
...
I: Fixing up permissions for removed write rights -- we aren't done yet!
chmod +w -R
/home/ibanez/src/fis-gtm-packaged/f
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >A) We need to address a Post-Installation step
> >where some .m files are compiled in their
> >final destination. We are brainstorming on
>
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > >B) Testing, testing, testing: we need to do a lot
> > > of testing on the resulting build, to make
> > > sure that we got things right.
>
> Do you feel the time is ripe for an upload to experimental (and could
> yo
Andreas,
A quick update on the status of the fis-gtm package.
After the hackathon on Wednesday, there has been
further activity and things are coming along nicely.
The most recent version of the fis-gtm source tree along with
the corresponding CMakeLists.txt file is here (in a branch):
https:
Hi Andreas,
Good news,
the plan for the hackathon today is unfolding nicely:
https://github.com/luisibanez/fis-gtm/wiki/Debian-Packaging-Hackathon
We will be starting at 9am EST, probably focusing first
on the fisgtm+cmake portion of the agenda, and we
anticipate that the afternoon will be focu
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> Well, as things stand now, ITK 4 no longer builds on
> AMD64, either, so I was unable to upload.
>
>
Is there a way I could see online the errors in AMD64 ?
I don't have an AMD64 machine, but might be able to help.
Thanks
L
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> I am around 3-4 hour drive away but not sure if I would be of
> particular use due to my overall ignorance in GT.M and even cmake.
>
>
Hi Yaroslav,
I think the hackathon will greatly benefit from your participation.
GTM expertise w
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> Exactly! And there is more to it. Someone bold could event exaggerate
> that requiring "open code" on its own is **"useless"** besides for being
> an "ideal description of the method implementation". Why "useless"?
> Because in ma
Luis
--
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>>
>> Please note that "some time in June" is to late to me
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Please note that "some time in June" is to late to meet the Freeze "in
> second half of June". This in turn would mean another two years of
> Debian stable without GT.M (at least).
>
Oops,...
Thanks for pointing this out.
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 01:15:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Hi Luis,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:02:00AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> > > > Yes, there has been a bi
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Brendon Higgins wrote:
> Ideally the whole system should be open, not just the chunk of code unique
> to
> each experiment.
>
>
+1 Luis
What is more interesting is the reaction that
followed in serious scientific journals:
1) PLoS ONE (the Open Access Mega Journal that currently
publishes 3% of all the STM literature) now requires
software papers to include the source code under an
Open Source license:
http://www
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
